Search for: "Levy v. Levi"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 3,416
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2017, 12:04 pm
R.S. 30:103.1 in order to avoid the immense penalties that may be levied against them under the Third Circuit’s interpretation of La. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 12:04 pm
R.S. 30:103.1 in order to avoid the immense penalties that may be levied against them under the Third Circuit’s interpretation of La. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 9:09 am
Co. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 7:47 am
In a 1977 case called Abood v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
The Supreme Court of Canada had the opportunity to address these questions when it recently released the twin decisions of R v Peers, 2017 SCC 13 and R v Aitkens, 2017 SCC 14. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 2:18 pm
” Half a century, in its landmark decision in Griswold v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 7:26 am
Supreme Court’s 1977 decision in Abood v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 10:58 am
— Paul Alan Levy (@paulalanlevy) March 23, 2017 @staciriordan SCOTUS did not hold that cheerleading uniforms are protected by #copyright. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:37 am
Lawprof Ken Levy offers an interesting approach. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 6:30 am
In Bronston v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 4:45 am
My hazy recollection is that my first solo trial was in small claims court in San Antonio – over money owed to the client – and that after I won, the question was how to levy on the defendant, who we sued precisely because he was a deadbeat. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 9:05 pm
[Packingham v. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 5:05 pm
On the same date there was a hearing in the case of PTW v WPT before Lewis J who gave an ex tempore judgment. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 9:15 am
Arguably, one decision, Krayzel Corp. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 1:42 pm
Wills), Financial Rescue LLC v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 12:00 am
Helmut Brokelmann and Mariarosaria Ganino ask C-449/14 P DTS v Commission: When is a Tax Measure State Aid? [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 3:16 am
(Daily.2016.Professors) Tristan Gray–Le Coz and Charles Duan, Apply It to the USPTO: Review of the Implementation of Alice v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 12:30 am
Walker v. [read post]
4 Mar 2017, 12:39 pm
Furthermore that, as unlike in Jones v Southwark Council where Southwark had purported to change their agreement with Thames Water, Greenwich agreement continued to operate the Defendant was entitled to the discount on future charges levied under the terms of the agreement between Thames Water and the Royal Borough of Greenwich. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
”Latest Court of Session opinion on Heather Capital, published 28 February 2017: EXTRA DIVISION, INNER HOUSE, COURT OF SESSION[2017] CSIH 19 CA207/14 and CA208/14 Lady Paton Lady Clark of Calton Lord Glennie OPINION OF LADY PATON in the cause HEATHER CAPITAL LIMITED (in liquidation) and PAUL DUFFY (as liquidator) Pursuer and Reclaimer against LEVY & McRAE and others Defenders and Respondents and HEATHER CAPITAL LIMITED (in liquidation) and PAUL DUFFY (as liquidator)… [read post]
