Search for: "Long v. Superior Court"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 3,871
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2017, 6:49 am
In Jersey City POBA v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 9:42 am
Second, the higher education establishment long anticipated that the SFFA v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 12:08 pm
The rules require that, for the convenience of trial judges, some such materials be 'lodged' in the superior court when cited. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 3:43 pm
The court’s decision in Howell v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 3:26 pm
The lawsuit is filed under 07-2-05481-2 in the King County Superior Court, Washington. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 10:20 am
Superior Court, Cal. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 6:19 am
The Superior Court – Appellate Division affirmed Spriggs's conviction in People v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 3:00 am
” Kendall-Jackson v. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 8:18 pm
Although the tort of intimidation has long been recognized as giving rise to a cause of action, as affirmed in cases such as Tran v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 3:18 pm
We’re happy to announce that the New Jersey Attorney General has dropped its investigation of Tidbit as detailed in a consent order filed yesterday in Essex County Superior Court in New Jersey. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 8:32 am
James Franco's 'Alien v Riff Raff In order to enforce his right of publicity successfully in the US (this is a right which does not exist in the UK, as explained in the case of Rihanna)- a plaintiff must demonstrate the following criteria established in Eastwood v Superior Court (California Court of Appeal, 1983): (1) Defendant’s use of Plaintiff’s identity (2) … [read post]
1 May 2021, 1:44 pm
Superior Ct. by the California Supreme Court, formalizing the so-called “ABC Test” of ascertaining when a person is an employee or an independent contractor. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 9:30 am
Last year the United States Supreme Court held in Pliva, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 5:05 am
Borcea v. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 8:01 am
Rona v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 2:11 pm
However, it should be noted that that the Board’s “correctness” niche carved out by the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) pre-Vavilov wherein some issues arise both in tariff hearings and in infringement proceedings in the superior Courts may one day now be revisited as to whether this is still “good law”. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 6:07 am
A recent case decided in the Delaware Superior Court adhered to this view. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 4:00 am
The New Decision – Abu Gosh v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 1:14 pm
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 5:00 am
’s “respondent superior” claims were reinstated. [read post]
