Search for: "MATTER OF C B J B" Results 1141 - 1160 of 3,069
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2019, 6:08 am by Jessica Kroeze
Their admittance was therefore at the board's discretion (Article 13(1) and (3) RPBA).2.2 When exercising their discretion to admit late-filed requests into the proceedings, in particular requests filed after arrangement of oral proceedings, the boards of appeal take into account in particular whether the proposed amendments do not introduce new objections (Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the EPO, 8th ed., IV.E.4.1.3, second paragraph).2.2.1 Applying these principles to the present case,… [read post]
27 Jul 2024, 4:19 pm by Ilya Somin
Since political influence is a zero-sum game, giving more votes to Group A necessarily reduces the proportional electoral weight of B, C, and D. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 10:00 am by Katherine Gallo
 For over 20 years John has has handled hundreds of coverage cases  involving Construction litigation and other complex matters for over twenty years. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 4:47 am
Floyd J dismissed the claimants' action. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 4:54 am
Inter-parte proceedings will usually take at least a month to be heard, although where urgency can be established the matter can be heard in a matter of days. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 4:38 am by Romano Beitsma
In a communication pursuant to Article 15(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal (RPBA), which was annexed to the summons to oral proceedings, the Board communicated its preliminary non-binding opinion.The Board introduced in the proceedings of its own motion the documentD6: US 6529801 B1which was cited and commented in the description of the present application.According to the Board's preliminary opinion, the subject matter of all independent claims of all three… [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm by MOTP
The Texas high court for civil matters concludes that the Texas law at issue (Section 74.451 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code), does not squarely fall within the scope of a state law enacted to regulate the business of insurance. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 12:33 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
The three judges each wrote their own opinions, and broke down this way: GRIFFIN, J., announced the judgment of the court and delivered the opinion of the court with respect to the Introduction and Parts II, III.G., and IV, and delivered an opinion with respect to Parts I, III, III.A, B, C, D, E, and F. [read post]