Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 42,189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2022, 1:24 pm
Cheng does not explain why, under his proposed “consensus rule,” subject matter experts are needed at all. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 8:27 am
The Proposed Rules would have limited the number of continuing applications, RCEs, and claims that an applicant could make as a matter of right. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 9:36 am
In other words, anything inadmissible in evidence, e.g., irrelevant facts or hearsay matters would not be taken in as evidence, even though stated on affidavit. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 8:32 am
The CEO's attorney argued that this piece of evidence essentially amounted to "other act evidence," which is prohibited under Federal Rule of Evidence 404. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 12:29 pm
Black Lives Matter has shown us policemen who continued to insist on their version of events when there is videotaped evidence to the contrary, or when physical evidence and eyewitnesses contradicts their account of events. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 10:06 am
And in yet another twist, the court declined to rule on whether retention of the forensic mirrors violates the Fourth Amendment, ultimately refusing to suppress any evidence based on the “good faith” exception to the exclusionary rule. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 2:08 pm
Our team provides the highest quality representation for criminal charges, no matter the severity and no matter the complexity. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 5:45 am
In so reasoning, we give effect to White’s teaching that “[c]ontext matters. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 12:21 pm
Until today, Illinois courts have never specifically defined what sort of “special circumstances” might create a duty to preserve, so the majority considered the matter at some length. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 9:45 am
Jan. 6, 2015), a district court ruled that a search warrant for an e-mail account for all evidence of violations of the federal computer hacking statute failed to comply with the Fourth Amendment because it did not particularly describe the evidence to be seized. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 8:09 am
A motion in limine is a pretrial motion made by one party requesting that the court rule on the admissibility of evidence before the evidence is presented at trial. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 12:41 pm
When is a franchise agreement unconscionable and, therefore, unenforceable as a matter of law? [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 5:06 pm
The matter was adjourned. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 3:57 pm
” But, apparently, coercion doesn’t matter. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 11:03 am
However, we remain hopeful that the CFPB will make good on its commitment that any rule-making on these matters will be evidence-based. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 9:48 am
Rule 901(a) of the Federal Rules of Evidence says the “requirement of authentication . . . as a condition precedent to admissibility is satisfied by evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims” it to be. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 5:12 am
Military Rule of Evidence 606 states the basic rule against questioning the panel members during or after the trial about what went on during deliberations. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 10:00 pm
Citing to a number of cases, the court overruled the defense's objection and allowed the opinion on the basis that experts are permitted to offer their opinions as to the future treatment required by a Plaintiff's injury or condition based upon facts in evidence that the jury would be warranted in relying upon.References to learned treatises is hearsay in Pennsylvania state court (but allowed in a limited fashion)In yet another pre-trial detailed Order… [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 7:00 am
The Appellate Division sustained the Supreme Court's ruling explaining that "[t]he fundamental, neutral precept of contract interpretation is that agreements are construed in accord with the parties' intent and the best evidence of what parties to a written agreement intend is what they say in their writing". [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 7:00 am
The Appellate Division sustained the Supreme Court's ruling explaining that "[t]he fundamental, neutral precept of contract interpretation is that agreements are construed in accord with the parties' intent and the best evidence of what parties to a written agreement intend is what they say in their writing". [read post]
