Search for: "MATTER OF T J B" Results 1141 - 1160 of 3,085
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2018, 10:50 pm
It was held in T-136/11 Pelicantravel.com sro v OHIM that such a practice “may” constitute bad faith. [read post]
22 May 2018, 11:05 pm by Tessa Shepperson
The subject matter, land, is, after all, both very important and limited. [read post]
22 May 2018, 11:05 pm by Tessa Shepperson
The subject matter, land, is, after all, both very important and limited. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:31 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: For this blog, Andrew Hamm reports that Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg received the Henry J. [read post]
19 May 2018, 3:10 pm by Quinta Jurecic, Benjamin Wittes
It wasn’t that long ago that both the executive branch and the legislature in this country considered the protection of intelligence sources a matter of surpassing national importance. [read post]
16 May 2018, 8:10 am by Tim Sitzmann
But what if this isn’t just a regular beaver? [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:44 am by John Buhl
Key Findings The previous “worldwide” or residence-based corporate tax system was flawed as it encouraged corporations to “invert,” discouraged corporations from repatriating foreign profits, and created a competitive disadvantage for U.S. corporations operating in foreign countries. [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
At the outset we emphasize that "[t]he Legislature enacted FOIL to provide the public with a means of access to governmental records in order to encourage public awareness and understanding of and participation in government and to discourage official secrecy" (Matter of Alderson v New York State Coll. of Agric. [read post]
2 May 2018, 1:10 am by Jelle Hoekstra
Notice of opposition was filed against the granted patent, the opponent requesting revocation of the patent in its entirety on the grounds of lack of novelty and inventive step (Articles 54(2) and 56 EPC and Article 100(a) EPC), lack of sufficiency of disclosure (Article 100(b) EPC) and added subject-matter (Article 100(c) EPC).III. [read post]
2 May 2018, 1:10 am by Jelle Hoekstra
Notice of opposition was filed against the granted patent, the opponent requesting revocation of the patent in its entirety on the grounds of lack of novelty and inventive step (Articles 54(2) and 56 EPC and Article 100(a) EPC), lack of sufficiency of disclosure (Article 100(b) EPC) and added subject-matter (Article 100(c) EPC).III. [read post]