Search for: "MAY v. MAY" Results 1141 - 1160 of 182,908
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2010, 11:55 am by Tom W. Bell
Courts have already explained that wrongs under the Maryland Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Act require a showing that someone's reasonable expectation of privacy has suffered violation (see Fearnow v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 1:28 pm
 But take your lumps and admit that what transpired should not have occurred.Because only then will you have a chance of getting paragraphs like this one from Judge Kozinski:"After oral argument before us, the United States Attorney 'concede[d] that [the] cross-examination of defendant was error' and advised us that she 'has instituted—in addition to existing training—a semi-monthly training update for the Criminal Division regarding pre-trial and trial phases .… [read post]
26 May 2020, 3:11 pm
Legal doctrine may be somewhat indeterminate, but it can nonetheless answer questions. [read post]
16 May 2017, 11:53 am
"At midday on May 7, 2012, defendant attacked Shannon Collins, a woman whom he did not know, as she was walking on Broadway in Santa Cruz. [read post]
31 May 2017, 12:20 pm
Thus, innocent defendants may not be shackled at any point in the courtroom unless there is an individualized showing of need. [read post]
22 May 2013, 4:58 am
 Reversible error.So for any jurors who may be reading the California Appellate Report while you are still a juror:  Stop now. [read post]
6 May 2015, 2:21 pm
The system uses "character recognition software” to read the license plate’s number from the image and “almost instantly” checks the number against a list of “known license plates” associated with suspected crimes—or a “hot list”—to determine whether a vehicle may be stolen or otherwise associated with a crime, AMBER alert or outstanding warrant. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:16 am by Simon Lovegrove (UK)
On 24 May 2024, there was published a joint statementbetween HM Treasury and the European Commission covering the second EU-UK Financial Regulatory Forum. [read post]
4 May 2010, 11:01 am
And since the district court's ruling really did prevent Stever from arguing that it was someone else, that seems like reversible error to me.Admittedly, I think that there may be some "strategery" going on here, and have a weak sense (though may be totally making this up) that the defense requested the discovery at issue not only because it might use it at trial, but also because producing it would be a big hassle for the government and thus incline them to plea the… [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 6:23 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Supreme Court has held that the states may disarm people who are subject to a domestic violence restraining order. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 6:59 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Despite that alleged performance problem, plaintiff may sue for racial discrimination on a selective enforcement theory under Title VII.The case is Davis v. [read post]