Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 9,178
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2021, 3:55 am
Kozodaeva's admission that she never used the subject mark in United States commerce "would appear to seal Petitioner's victory on the nonuse claim. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 12:59 pm
" United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 9:19 am
The specific intent of “attempted entry” goes to whether the person specifically intended to enter the United States. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
In Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
In Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 1:30 pm
Source: Apple Inc. v Registrar of Trade Marks [2014] FCA 1304 [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 3:43 am
The similar set of facts in this case involved Audi and Volkswagen (VW), both very well-known car manufacturers which own a number of registered EU and national trade marks in respect of their logos.Fruugo was founded in the United Kingdom in 2008, and operates an online marketplace which is available in 42 countries through various domain names. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 5:47 am
United States, a Pennsylvania woman’s challenge to her conviction for violating federal laws implementing the Chemical Weapons Convention. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 9:13 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 7:40 pm
All individuals and entities in the UnitedStates who (1) own, have owned, or otherwise have the right to enforce licensingrights to goods and services bearing trademarks or service marks registered withthe United States Patent and Trademark Office, (2) engage or have engaged incommercial transactions in Second Life associated with such registered trademarkor service marks, and (3) whose trademarks and/or service marks were infringedin Second Life.c) The… [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 2:36 pm
United States, when it held: "When a fragmented Court decides a case and no single rationale explaining the result enjoys the assent of five Justices, 'the holding of the Court may be viewed as that position taken by those Members who concurred in the judgments on the narrowest grounds.'" In United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
. — F.Supp.2d —-, 2007 WL 43747 (S.D.Ohio) United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
Third Circuit Finds Defendant Was Not Seized Where He Briefly Paused and Raised Hands Before Fleeing
15 Dec 2023, 8:29 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 1:26 pm
In affidavit evidence accepted by the Board, the calendars associated with the Mark were manufactured in the United States by MWV Consumer & Office Products, a division of the Registrant. [read post]
30 Jun 2007, 7:42 am
" (internal citations and quotation marks omitted)); see also United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 1:24 pm
" Petitioners -- the State of Texas; the Chamber of Commerce of the United States; and representatives of nationwide manufacturing, chemical and petroleum industries -- petition for review of the EPA's action under the Administrative Procedure Act. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 6:55 am
” In today’s second case, United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 11:45 pm
" Likewise of no import were the facts that Mellbeck was not represented by an attorney, and had no prior experience in United States trademark matters. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 9:07 am
June 28, 2024), the United States Supreme Court (Roberts, J.) held that the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) requires courts to independently determine whether an agency has acted within its authority. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 6:12 am
’This morning the Advocate General answered all this questions quite simply: ‘Where conduct occurs via the internet which is liable to infringe a national trade mark registered in a Member State, Article 5(3) of Regulation No 44/2001 must be interpreted as meaning that it attributes jurisdiction: – to the courts of the Member State in which the trade mark is registered [that's presumably good news for Wintersteiger, which has registered its… [read post]
