Search for: "Marks v. United States Department of Justice"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 1,626
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2013, 4:08 pm
Some of the background can be found in an article entitled “Right of Reply: A Comparative Approach” [pdf] by Andras Koltay, who also discusses the position in the United States and Canada. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
That means under the United States Code, there are no accepted medical uses. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
That means under the United States Code, there are no accepted medical uses. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 1:04 pm
Department of Justice v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 11:55 am
United States, which is currently pending appeal. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 5:40 pm
Reported on Friday by the Miami Herald’s Carol Rosenberg: defense attorneys in United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 4:37 pm
Lori Drew and in United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 5:55 am
Further, the United States Supreme Court recently heard arguments in Vance v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
As stated by Justice Wilson (at para. 59): I find it difficult to conceive of a situation in which compliance with fundamental justice could be achieved by a tribunal making significant findings of credibility solely on the basis of written submissions. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 6:36 pm
(IIT v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 3:00 am
Here's SCOTUSblog's coverage of the issue:The Justices agreed to hear an appeal by the federal government in United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 7:24 pm
Williams, 868 S.W.2d 294, 296 (Tex. 1993)(stating that opinions from any federal or state court may be relied on a persuasive authority, but Texas appellate courts are obligated to follow only higher Texas courts and the United States Supreme Court). [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 7:24 pm
Williams, 868 S.W.2d 294, 296 (Tex. 1993)(stating that opinions from any federal or state court may be relied on a persuasive authority, but Texas appellate courts are obligated to follow only higher Texas courts and the United States Supreme Court). [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Sackett v. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 7:52 pm
Jindal Global University; Formerly Professor and Dean, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, India Enforcing Socio-Economic Rights through Public Interest Litigation: An Overview of the Indian Experience 3) Dr Leïla Choukroune, Senior Lecturer in International Economic Law, Faculty of Law, Maastricht University, The Netherlands The Paradox of Justiciability: Labour PIL in China and India Questions/Comments 6:30pm-8:30pm – Welcome Dinner hosted by the City University Law School (by… [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 2:28 pm
Al- Sirri v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 54 - Supreme Court clarifies meaning of “guilty of acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations” for the purpose of refusing refugee status, two applicants lose appeal. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 7:24 am
Levenstein was convicted in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, for the failure to pay child support (see 18 USC § 228). [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 1:56 am
Now, in Rivers v Birnbaum 2012 NY Slip Op 06935 Decided on October 17, 2012 Appellate Division, Second Department Belen, J. the uncertainty is over. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 7:01 am
Of the ninety-four district courts across the United States, we have the sixth-heaviest criminal caseload per judge. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:13 am
Departments of Justice and the Treasury as areas of high risk for financial crimes and money laundering activity (High Intensity Financial Crime Areas or HIFCAs). [read post]
