Search for: "Matter of D.(daniel)" Results 1141 - 1160 of 1,546
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2022, 12:21 am by Eleonora Rosati
Applying the well-established test of “does the shape depart significantly from the norms or customs of the sector concerned”, the General Court concluded that the shape, apparently reminiscent of a “boat hull, a bassinet or an overturned ingot” (d’une coque de bateau, d’un couffin ou d’un lingot renversé), will cause the relevant public to “be surprised by this easily memorized shape”. [read post]
29 May 2015, 7:13 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  As has been said many times by this Office and as a matter of good practice, primary responsibility here should be about noninfringing uses. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
Should it be based on how the highest court ruled on the matter, which would then—on the particular waiver issue in this example-- result in a tie between the State of Texas (based state common law) and the Fifth Circuit (based on federal common law).Or should the counting and coding be based on how different courts ruled regardless of whether they were ultimately reversed? [read post]
20 Oct 2007, 7:34 am
  If the subject matter was obtained by honest means, should any new discoveries that are legitimately patentable as scientific innovations truly need to be credited to a vaguer, sometimes unverified body of local knowledge that set the inventor on his journey? [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
” He added that it was the “worst agreement I’d ever seen . . . . [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 8:31 am by Jillian C. York
There are some interesting problems here, and no easy solutions—I’d love to get your take on that. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 3:46 am by Kevin LaCroix
” He certified the following question to the Georgia Supreme Court:   Does the business judgment rule in Georgia preclude as a matter of law a claim for ordinary negligence against the officers and directors of a bank in a lawsuit brought by the FDIC as receiver for the bank? [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 8:33 pm
I swore I would never, ever, ever prosecute juveniles (still thinking, in my naïveté, that I would have had a choice in the matter) so I didn't feel conflicted about defending them. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
I’m inclined to agree with Daniel Deacon that this “little bit wrong” rule is unsound. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 10:12 pm by pfriedman
If you’re Karen Silkwood or Daniel Ellsberg, it would be, but I have grave doubts that the people complaining to me are in that league. [read post]