Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 1141 - 1160
of 16,493
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2019, 1:05 am
It claimed that the Board of Appeal had erred, first, in the comparison of the contested mark with the earlier mark and, secondly, in the global assessment of the likelihood of confusion.Last week, the GC handed down its decision on the matter, confirming the earlier take of the Board of Appeal.The legal frameworkUnder Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation 207/2009 (now Articles 60 and 8(1)(b) in Regulation 2017/1001 on the EU Trade Mark, EUTMR), read in conjunction with… [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 7:42 pm
It is marked "Confidential Legal Notice - Publication or Dissemination is Prohibited". [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 1:46 am
But wouldn't it be good to have that option? [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
The post It’s Our Turn to Lead appeared first on Mendik Matters. [read post]
18 May 2007, 1:25 pm
A breach of contract case was marked off the New York County Supreme Court's trial calendar and dismissed after twelve months of inactivity. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm
The fact that this system operated efficiently for many years was evidence that it was normally satisfactory (see T 30/90, J 31/90, J 32/90, T 309/88). [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 12:38 pm
Translational similarity matters: same meaning in different language could bar registration. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 3:09 pm
All three outlets go with the decidedly vague “sources briefed on the matter. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 7:13 am
You can tell what her perspective on the protection of well-known marks is, so I won’t detail it. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 2:54 pm
Remember Governor Mark Sanford of South Carolina? [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 6:48 am
And yet, before the election it was a matter of fierce moral urgency. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 10:59 am
As to material differences, rental mattered: “[C]ustomers who rent a pump (or any product for that matter) are likely to assume that it has been used before and therefore is not in pristine condition. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:14 am
Even looking at Asiarim’s claim to own the marks to one licensor and one potential licensor, that wasn’t disseminated to the public. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 8:25 am
If he doesn't, this will be the last post on the matter… [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 2:06 pm
Could an argument of damage to the specific subject matter of Ferrari’s trade mark by the removal of the Ferrari badges be made in this-- very different-- context? [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 1:56 pm
(Though in copyright it doesn’t seem to matter too much.) [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 am
Other place we focus on D’s use is dilution, which seems to imply that the D must be using the matter as “a mark or trade name. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm
In case of doubt the board had, so the argument, no choice according to T 1505/06 [3.1] but to remit the case. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 4:34 am
Just asking this question marks me as completely unwoke, for if I were otherwise, I would understand that unseating Trump is the only thing that matters. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 3:41 am
You can't get out of these suits by saying "I didn't intend to deceive anyone. [read post]
