Search for: "Mays v. Parker"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 1,371
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2010, 3:51 am
The judgment of the PC was delivered by Sir Jonathan Parker and it will be of particular interest as it demonstrates the continuing importance of the Court of Appeal's excellent judgment in Gillett v Holt [2000] EWCA Civ 66 as well as raising (without deciding) the interesting issue of the remedy when section 116, LRA 2002 is in issue in relation to third party buyers after the estoppel has been established. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 4:23 am
May 25, 2005) (refusing to dismiss FLSA action where “other plaintiffs. opted in to [the] suit [after] the offer of judgment was made”); Roble v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 4:58 am
Parker J rejected the Claim. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 4:30 am
Another first year associate, Liam Priory, (Ben Lawson) almost breaks an ethical rule by having sex with a client, but thankfully, any sexual activity that may or may not have occurred took place before any retention agreement was signed. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 5:23 am
Marquess & Nell, Inc., 144 N.J. 34 (N.J. 1996); Parker v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 7:35 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 1:34 pm
Parker serves as the foundation for much of our modern eminent domain jurisprudence, including the controversial 2005 Supreme Court decision in Kelo v. [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
December 14, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 12:33 am
" PDK Labs., Inc. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 7:25 pm
Parker, 348 U.S. 26 (1954), the case in which the U.S. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 8:55 am
Parker on SSRN. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 6:10 am
" Ward v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 12:32 pm
Altitude Nines, LLC v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 10:01 am
In the 7-4 decision, the Court of Appeals cites executive authority and national security concerns in declining to extend Bivens liability in this context.The case is Arar v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 9:58 am
Parker, Case No. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 7:27 am
Parker Oil Co. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2009, 8:52 am
The court in Parker v. [read post]
24 Oct 2009, 8:52 am
The court in Parker v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 1:00 pm
Parker, 912 N.E.2d 378,385 (Ind. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 10:21 am
In State v. [read post]
