Search for: "Mays v. Social Security Administration" Results 1141 - 1160 of 2,258
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2009, 3:25 pm
This is probably because some of the cited material may be hard to find.... [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 1:47 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Of the 23 SPAC-related securities suits filed in 2022, 17 were filed prior to May 31, 2022 – only six SPAC-related securities suits were filed after May 31. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:09 am by Rosalind English
But the Secure Training Centre Rules are more specific. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 4:49 pm by Kevin LaCroix
These new lawsuits may be the first securities class action lawsuits based on alleged misrepresentations on Twitter. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 4:49 pm by Kevin LaCroix
These new lawsuits may be the first securities class action lawsuits based on alleged misrepresentations on Twitter. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:33 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  When the SEC sheepishly announced the data breach and the irony that stolen EDGAR information may have been used to profit in a securities fraud scheme perpetrated by the cyber-attackers, the SEC was imparted one important lesson first-hand: Outsider Trading Should be a Top SEC Enforcement Priority. [read post]
12 Oct 2024, 4:45 am by jonathanturley
The massive influx of millions of undocumented persons is now a national crisis with growing national security, economic, and social costs for the nation. [read post]
7 May 2015, 7:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
“It is key that all staff receive security awareness training covering your acceptable usage policy for social networking. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 11:11 am by Karen Denvir
In accordance with the Uhms’ election to receive benefits under Part D, the Social Security Administration withheld monthly premiums from their social security benefits. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 3:24 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Her argument: administrative constitutionalism has slowly shifted the balance between national security and free speech. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 7:16 am by Amy Howe
  Instead, it is about whether Congress can treat married same-sex couples differently from married opposite-sex couples in federal laws and programs like Social Security benefits, immigration, and income taxes. [read post]
So long as the bank account is in their name and uses one of their social security numbers, it won’t create a problem with my government benefits. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
(Securing Innovation) Why blog about intellectual property? [read post]