Search for: "Mays v. State"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 119,883
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2017, 10:34 am
The case before the Supreme Court that will hopefully decide the matter is Cyan v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 10:34 am
The case before the Supreme Court that will hopefully decide the matter is Cyan v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 3:44 am
On July 12, 2019, defendants, on behalf of plaintiffs, commenced a hybrid Article 78 proceeding captioned Ressler v New York State Dept. of Envtl. [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 7:41 am
See Rolen v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:15 am
An individual may not withdraw or rescind his or her resignation without the consent of the appointing authorityMatter of Lewis v State Univ. of N.Y. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 7:34 am
On Monday, the first day of the new Supreme Court term, the Court heard argument in Kahler v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 6:23 am
Co. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:35 pm
Maryland State Comptroller of the Treasury v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 7:05 pm
State v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 9:54 am
—, but that a majority of voters in a state may choose to ban the practice. [read post]
2 May 2017, 1:00 am
On Wednesday 3 May and Thursday 4 May, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of P v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis. [read post]
27 May 2009, 5:57 am
State. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:37 pm
The two movants in United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 4:30 am
Last year, the Supreme Court decided Wyeth v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 2:39 pm
In United States v.Conrad Clinton Blair, No. 12-4427, the Court rejects an expansive reading of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Descamps v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 12:05 am
R v Docherty, 3-4 May 2016. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 11:14 am
State v. [read post]
United States v. Fosler: CAAF holds Article 134 adultery sample specification fails to state offense
8 Aug 2011, 11:53 pm
Is Parker v. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 11:15 am
SENTENCINGUnited States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 6:38 am
In other words, under more recent Supreme Court precedent, Garcia may no longer be good law.The intervening Supreme Court precedent on sovereign immunity and the ADA is United States v. [read post]