Search for: "Means v. State"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 61,648
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2024, 9:15 am
Huynh v. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
Wade with Dobbs v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:11 am
Prigg v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 5:50 pm
Kendrick v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 1:50 pm
Rodriguez v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 9:41 pm
McDonald v. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 6:16 am
" Furthermore, merely because the officer's stop of Petitioner was determined to be invalid does not mean that his conduct was flagrant.Holding:Assuming arguendo that the police encounter constituted an illegal stop, the ultimate question is more appropriate: whether it was proper for the trial court to grant Petitioner's motion to suppress the evidence. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 2:54 am
In the case of Mitchell v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 12:37 pm
” Pfeiffer v. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 4:29 am
Co-author Max Brown Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 6:55 am
In Mayer v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 9:31 pm
Here is the abstract: In the recently decided United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 6:36 am
Espinoza v. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 8:54 am
Q: What does this mean for me if I live in one of the states that will eventually comply with Real ID? [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 11:55 pm
Delay in issuing arbitration decision did not constitute misconduct by the arbitrator within the meaning of Article 75 of the CPLRSquillini v State of New York, App. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:10 am
State v. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:25 pm
I want to respond here to two points made by Paul, both of which I regard as highly creative, which in this context means that they are clever but really have no relationship to reality.First, Colorado v. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:25 pm
I want to respond here to two points made by Paul, both of which I regard as highly creative, which in this context means that they are clever but really have no relationship to reality.First, Colorado v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 8:56 am
Still, in situations where a stepparent voluntarily receives a stepchild into his or her family and treated the child as a family member, he or she could be considered in loco parentis, meaning he or she assumes an obligation to maintain and support the child. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 5:02 am
Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision last year in District of Columbia v. [read post]
