Search for: "Medical Associates, Inc., Appeal of"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 1,714
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2012, 8:20 am
Allergan Inc is the manufacturer and registered proprietor of Botox. [read post]
21 May 2012, 2:15 pm
Petition for certiorari Brief in oppositionAmicus brief of the American Immigration Lawyers AssociationAmicus brief of Law Professors (forthcoming)Amicus brief of Former Federal Prosecutors, et al.Amicus brief of Immigration Law ProfessorsAmicus brief of National Legal Aid & Defenders Association and Public CounselAmicus brief of Criminal Law Professors Reply of petitioner (forthcoming) Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm
“[T]he reason that manufacturers are under a duty to test their products is to discover defects or dangers associated with use of the products. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 2:49 pm
The law was challenged in federal court by three data-mining companies, IMS Health Inc., Verispan LLC, and Source Healthcare Analytics, Inc., and by the trade group for drug manufacturers, the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 11:50 am
Take prompt action to provide appropriate intervention and medical care in response to signs of potential heat related health issues. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 11:13 pm
The defendant, charged with attempted capital murder, malicious wounding and use of a firearm, offered to finish the job himself.
ALM Privacy Policy / Contact Us
© 2007 ALM Properties, Inc. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 10:26 am
On appeal, the U.S. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 7:37 pm
USA, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 1:41 pm
This dichotomy led the appeal in American Automobile Ins. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 8:17 am
Handy Technologies Inc., No. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 7:52 pm
The EEOC says Magnolia’s prohibited discriminatory practices included only offering positions to certain applicants under the condition that the applicants pass a medical examination, as well as discharging or revoking job offers when it learned of or received records of prior medical conditions or current medical restrictions. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:49 pm
City of Boca Raton and Burlington Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm
Canada On 1 February 2017, the Court of Appeal for Ontario handed down judgment in the case of The Catalyst Capital Group Inc. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
: Peer International Corporation, Southern Music Publishing Co and Peermusic (UK) Ltd v Editoria Musical de Cuba (IP finance) Justice Kitchin upholds British Beer and Pub Association and British Hospitality Association appeal against decision of Copyright Tribunal on basis for calculation of fees which members have to pay for background music (IPKat) Contempt of court: the risks of false testimony in trade mark infringement proceedings: KJM Superbikes Ltd v Hinton (IPKat)… [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:09 am
CLIENT LIST• SPEECHES (not complete list): National Venture Capital Association, U.S. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 9:30 pm
Auto-Chlor System of Washington, Inc. (2013) 220 Cal. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:21 am
California Teachers Association 14-915Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on an amicus brief by the American Federation of Teachers and American Association of University Professors in support of the respondents in this case.Issue: (1) Whether Abood v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 2:06 pm
In ZCD Transportation, Inc., v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 7:32 am
” In doing so, Congress deliberately sought to overturn Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. [read post]
