Search for: "Michigan v. United States" Results 1141 - 1160 of 3,260
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2017, 6:11 am
Glenn, supra.The Court of Appeals goes on to explain how and why the prosecution arose, what it involved and why Glenn was convicted:Defendant, an officer with the United States Customs and Border Patrol (CBP), worked at the Canada–United States border in Detroit, Michigan, during the relevant year of 2013. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 4:18 am by SHG
Lett, a chance to make sense of their predecessors' decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 8:53 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Sierra Club v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 1:30 am by Paul Cassell
United States, 510 U.S. 540, 550–51 (1994) (internal quotations omitted). [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 3:52 pm by The Law Blogger
 The Michigan Court of Appeals recently decided Long Lake Township v Maxon, an interesting case pitting evidence gathered by a drone against a couple's right to privacy on their own property. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 7:02 am
In light of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Arizona v Gant, 556 U.S. ___, 129 S Ct 1710, 173 L Ed 2d 485 (2009), which abrogated the well-established rule in New York v Belton, 453 U.S. 454; 101 S Ct 2860; 69 L Ed 2d 768 (1981) and its progeny, we must consider whether an officer's good faith reliance on case law that is later overturned may form a proper basis to avoid the operation of the exclusionary rule. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 12:57 pm by WIMS
On Petition for Review of Final Actions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 2:02 pm
The Michigan Attorney General appeals the district court's decision declaring unconstitutional a state law that regulates abortion methods. [read post]
3 May 2011, 10:08 am by Laura Davis, AFPD, FDSET
Judges will remind you unpublished opinions have limited precedential value, but even they cite them from time to time (as Judge White recently did on page 4 of United States v. [read post]