Search for: "Miller v. People" Results 1141 - 1160 of 1,866
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2013, 11:30 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Wells noted the Supreme Court’s decision in Kiobel v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
In this week’s case (Miller v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 7:26 pm
  Presenting a European Union perspective was Monika Tomczak-Gorlikowska (Miller Canfield). [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 9:20 am by Venkat
The court was faced with the question of whether the statute covered content that was obscene as defined by the Miller v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 4:02 am by John L. Welch
USPTO Drops Idea of Moving Up Deadline for First Filing of Section 8 Declarations of UseThe TTAB Issued 42 Precedential Decisions in 2012Supreme Court Affirms Dismissal of Already v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 12:27 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
Miller, which similarly relied on the third party doctrine to hold that people's bank records were the property of the bank and not subject to a warrant requirement. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 7:32 am by SJM
OK, so the title of this post may be an exaggeration of what is only a passing reference to an old friend in Fareham BC v Miller [2013] EWCA Civ 159. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 7:32 am by SJM
OK, so the title of this post may be an exaggeration of what is only a passing reference to an old friend in Fareham BC v Miller [2013] EWCA Civ 159. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 6:57 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
  For example, recent cases percolating through the appellate courts here in Michigan address whether SCOTUS' Miller decision should be applied retroactively.In People v Carp, for example, the Michigan Court of Appeals held that the SCOTUS' Eighth Amendment ruling did not apply retroactively. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 4:11 am by Clark
Miller – 307 U.S. 174 of 1939. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 6:27 pm by Rumpole
 And so it has come to pass that a young assistant state attorney, who frequented an aforementioned establishment,  ( one would expect in an attempt to satisfy some prurient interest, see, e.g, Miller v. [read post]