Search for: "Murphy v. State" Results 1141 - 1160 of 2,101
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2012, 2:05 am by John L. Welch
Murphy, Cancellation No. 92047058 (January 12, 2012) [not precedential]. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Murphy v Murphy 2017 ONSC 1678 Beaudoin J awarded totals of $70,000 and $90.000 against the first and second defendants who had failed to file defences to a libel claim. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 5:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Servs., Inc., 188 AD3d 624, 626 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Murphy v Kuhn, 90 NY2d 266, 270; MAAD Constr., Inc. v Cavallino Risk Mgt., Inc., 178 AD3d 816, 818). [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 10:31 am
Andersen continues to be represented by Lybeck Murphy of Mercer Island, Washington. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At The Nation, Dave Zirin interviews former NBA player and New Jersey Senator Bill Bradley, the prime mover behind the federal law that barred states from legalizing sports betting, which the court struck down this term in Murphy v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A 49-Year Crusade: Inside the movement to overturn Roe v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 10:10 am by Scott R. Anderson
In its 1983 decision in the matter of INS v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 12:42 pm by Steve Lash
The Maryland Court of Appeals, in DRD Pool Service Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 10:30 am by Matthew Scott Johnson
Murphy’s article Abandon Chevron and Modernize Stare Decisis for the Administrative State is cited in the following article: Heather Elliott, Gorsuch v. the Administrative State, 70 ALA. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
In 1876, lawyer and legal publisher Carl Jahn published the first issue of the Weekly Cincinnati Law Bulletin, a precursor of the Ohio State Bar Journal, and solicited Ohio lawyers to submit “law points of general interest. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 1:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Seven states, however, tax people where their office is even if they do not actually work in the state, and these individuals may be denied their home state’s credit for taxes paid to another state, exposing them to double taxation. [read post]