Search for: "Nicholas v. State" Results 1141 - 1160 of 1,414
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2009, 1:58 am
Larrikin Music Publishing Pty Ltd v EMI Songs Australia Pty Limited [2009] FCA 799 Lid dip: Peter Nicholas A little bit of trivia: Men at Work, with Down Under, are one of 9 pop acts that have achieved simultaneous No. 1s in both the UK and USA, according to Wikipedia. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At Justia’s Verdict blog, Sherry Colb discusses the court’s decision in Moore v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 8:00 am by Steve Hall
They were ushered into a grand ceremonial courtroom to see if they might be candidates to serve as jurors in the case of the United States of America v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 7:38 am by NBlack
First, in July, the First Department handed down their decision in People v. [read post]
On August 24, 2015, the Third Circuit United States Court of Appeals issued its ruling in the case FTC v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 8:19 am by Doug Cornelius
Carlo V. di Florio, Director, United States Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations interviewed by Nicholas Donato, Editor, Private Equity Manager Mr. di Florio started off with some post-registration statistics: 3100 private funds with 8 trillion dollars in the funds. 4000 registered private fund advisers 37 of the 50 world’s biggest private equity fund managers are now registered. 48 of 50 world’s biggest hedge… [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:13 am
Sullivan, Ropes & Gray LLP, on Sunday, January 17, 2016 Tags: Compliance and disclosure interpretation, Derivatives, Investment Company Act, Investor protection, Leverage,Mutual funds, No-action letters, Private funds, Risk, Risk management, Rule 18f-4, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities Regulation, Swaps PECO v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 1:01 am by Tessa Shepperson
The problem The problem initially came to light in a case last year, Nicholas v Secretary of State for Defence, initially reported by Nearly Legal and which I reported on here. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 2:54 am by Melina Padron
Syed, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1059 (07 September 2011) Immigration: Court of Appeal confirms Article 8 ECHR need not necessarily be considered when deciding whether to grant indefinite leave to remain. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 2:10 pm by Sam Murrant
A post on the Freemovement blog on the recent case of Lamichhane v Secretary of State for the Home Department states that just that may be happening in a subset of immigration cases. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court said it cannot identify the person who in the spring leaked a draft of the opinion that overturned Roe v. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 8:55 pm
Then Judge Nicholas Geeker, of the circuit court in Escambia County, sentenced Mr. [read post]