Search for: "O’CONNOR V. STATE" Results 1141 - 1160 of 1,822
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2014, 11:43 am by Rick Garnett
On June 27, 2005 – the last day on the bench, it turned out, for both Chief Justice Rehnquist and Justice OConnor – the nine Justices managed to issue ten opinions regarding two challenges to public displays of the Ten Commandments. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 9:59 pm by Sam Eichner
In dissent, Justice OConnor criticized the majoritys analysis as an “exercise in judicial revisionism,” providing convincing evidence to support her argument that Congress never intended the FAA to apply in state court. [read post]
11 Mar 2017, 6:47 pm by Josh Blackman
Under Justice Jacksons canonical concurrence in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 6:38 am by MBettman
At issue in this case is whether the Supreme Court of Ohio should update and clarify its attorney fee jurisprudence by adopting the United States Supreme Courts guidance in Perdue v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 2:46 am by Scott Bomboy
United States (1992), Justice Sandra Day OConnor said that a federal waste-management law "would 'commandeer' state governments into the service of federal regulatory purposes and would for this reason be inconsistent with the Constitution's division of authority between federal and state governments. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 6:52 am
OConnor, 1301073, p. 3 (Louisiana Court of Appeal 4th Circuit 2/26/24), 135 So.3d 1198, 1202. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 6:44 am by James Bickford
” Finally, Justices Antonin Scalia and Stephen Breyer continued their debate on constitutional interpretation on Friday in Lubbock, Texas, as part of a lecture series honoring retired Justice Sandra Day OConnor. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 7:01 am by Conor McEvily
Debra Cassens Weiss at the ABA Journal reports on an appearance by Justice Breyer and retired Justice OConnor at the ABAs annual meeting. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 8:40 am by Christine Corcos
For years, she was dubbed as one of the first women to have argued before the nations highest court after Justice O’Connor’s 1981 ascent to the Supreme Court. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 9:17 am
Scalia seemed to be presuming that O’Connor’s successor, Samuel Alito Jr, would vote against such new causes of action.Roberts, too, seemed determined to draw a sharp historical boundary between now and then. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 7:51 am by Kali Borkoski
Retired Justice Sandra Day OConnor spoke recently at the Oklahoma City University School of Law about iCivics; coverage of the visit is available at NewsOK. [read post]
24 May 2011, 12:26 am by Orin Kerr
The panelists are Senator Kenneth Keating of New York; Senator John Carroll of Colorado; Virgil Peterson, then the Director of the Chicago Crime Commission; Frank OConnor, Queens County District Attorney; and Lawrence Speiser, then the Director of the ACLUs DC office.A little background is in order. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 7:15 am by Adam Chandler
The Las Vegas Suns Nevada Wonk blog has a post on retired Justice Sandra Day O’Connor’s meeting with the Suns editorial board, in which she advocated for merit selection of state judges. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 1:34 pm by Mark Walsh
OConnor agreed to stay on until her successor — Alito — was confirmed in late January 2006. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– Syracuse lawyer John Gaal of Bond Schoeneck & King on the firms Higher Education Law Report Prosecutions Use of Social Media Research – Hayes Hunt and Brian Kint of Cozen OConnor on Hayes blog, From the Sidebar State of the Union: Southern Style – Atlanta attorney Brennan Bolt of McKenna Long & Aldridge on the firms blog, Labor Relations Today Driving Under the… [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 11:25 am by Adam Feldman
Next was Justice Sandra Day OConnor, averaging a difference of over seven. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 11:34 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
District Court Judge Reed OConnor in the Northern District of Texas declared the federal Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) unconstitutional in an opinion in Brackeen et. al. v. [read post]