Search for: "Owens v. Owens" Results 1141 - 1160 of 1,701
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2011, 12:26 am by Graeme Hall
Owen Bowcott, writing in the Guardian, describes the judgment as a “significant victory for open justice”, but then continues to mention another decision of the Supreme Court (see also Rosalind English’s post) which ruled that such closed procedures can be used in employment tribunals. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 2:53 pm by Steve Hall
The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 5:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: In 1983, the California Supreme Court decided National Audubon Society v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 7:46 am by lopeznoriega
La Voladora solicitó la protección del Poder Judicial vía un amparo en contra de esta decisión y la Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación atrajo el caso en febrero de este año. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 10:52 am by Steve Matthews
David Silman, an injury lawyer with the Fraser Valley’s Waterstone Law Group, took issue with the recently upheld decision of Hussack v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 9:57 am by Anita Davies
But Mr Justice Owen allowed a negligence claim brought on behalf of one soldier’s child to go ahead. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 6:35 am by Adam Wagner
Mr Justice Owen in the High Court struck out the soldiers’ claims under the Human Rights Act. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 9:30 am by Dan Ernst
This effect was stronger for children residing in non-agricultural areas.This is in line with what I learned from a little research, conducted for my 2007 exam in American Legal History, on the administration of the Keating-Owen Act between its passage in 1916 and its demise in Hammer v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 5:50 am
Punitive damages are very rare in Maryland because in 1992 the Maryland Court of Appeals held in Owens-Illinois v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:54 am by Lawrence Solum
Specifically, the courts have had to decide whether religiously motivated anti-gay expression violated a provincial human rights code restriction on hateful expression (Owens v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 9:36 am by admin
Long-time District Court Judge Owen Panner recently granted a foreclosed-upon couple declaratory judgment against MERS in Hooker v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 9:36 am by admin
Long-time District Court Judge Owen Panner recently granted a foreclosed-upon couple declaratory judgment against MERS in Hooker v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:00 am by Kristina Araya
In Fisher Sand and Gravel Co v Neal A Sweebe, Inc, No. 297156, Judge Owens authored the majority opinion in this case of first impression, holding that the plaintiff’s claim for payment on an open account relating to the sale of goods was barred by the four year limitations period in the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 2:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
As to the first prong, "[a]n attorney may be liable for ignorance of the rules of practice, for failure to comply with conditions precedent to suit, for neglect to prosecute or defend an action, or for failure to conduct adequate legal research" (Conklin v Owen, 72 AD3d 1006, 1007). [read post]