Search for: "People v Justice A." Results 1141 - 1160 of 22,964
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2008, 6:30 am
Justice Joyce Kennard The California Supreme Court has ruled unanimously, in a decision written by Justice Joyce Kennard, in Benitez v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 3:25 am by Lyle Denniston
  His vote and his opinions created a revolution for gay rights, helped save Roe v. [read post]
29 May 2020, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
[v] But, to contrary appearances, on February 27, 2020, the Law Society of Ontario (LSO) released its Priority Planning Committee’s Strategic Plan (LSO’s Treasurer (“President” in other provinces), Malcolm Mercer, being the Chair of the Committee). [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 7:16 am
Lady Justice ArdenAs Lady Justice Arden pointed out in her leading judgment, Gallarotti v Sebastianelli [2012] EWCA Civ 865 did not require the Court of Appeal to decide any new law: "Nonetheless, this appeal may be of wide interest as the factual paradigm is not uncommon. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 4:57 am by Amy Howe
But yesterday’s oral argument in Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 10:00 am by azatty
Thurgood Marshall’s interracial love: ‘I don’t care what people think. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 5:47 am by Mike "No Man" Navarre
   Justice Rehnquist summed up that foundation nicely in Goldman v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 10:17 pm
In reversing in the interest of justices, the Court wroteas defendant correctly contends, the prosecutor improperly vouched for the credibility of the People's witnesses during both his opening and closing statements (see People v LaDolce, 196 AD2d 49, 57; see generally People v Bailey, 58 NY2d 272, 277-278). [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 2:31 pm
 The opinion deals with this contention in a single paragraph at the end.On the merits, Justice Lui seems entirely right that any error, even if it existed, would be harmless.But there's no factual background about what evidence what admitted on the credit limit issue, or for what alleged purpose. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 2:14 pm
  Usually the justices just say "conspired to murder" that person. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:41 pm
  At least that's the conclusion that one might reasonably draw from Justice Wiley's opinion.No one really knows what happened for sure. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 3:00 pm
  Fair enough.When Justice McConnell recites the (brief) facts of the case, however, she describes the crime as follows:"In 2013, Flores and five codefendants were each charged by information with one count of the murder of victim John Doe [Cite] while they were engaged in the commission or attempted commission of a robbery [Cite] and a kidnapping . . . [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 12:39 pm
Justice McKinster tells me all about the significance of the numbers 14 and 88 to these types of gangs, which I already know. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 12:06 pm
 Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye says that when the judge -- after the jury said it was deadlocked -- twice told the bailiff to inspect the jury deliberation room, and the bailiff reported that all the guilt phase exhibits remained in the file drawers (i.e., hadn't been reviewed by the jury), at which point the trial judge responded to this report by giving a supplemental instruction to the jury, that process did not "intrude upon the jurors' mental processes. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 1:05 pm
  As Justice Dato explains: "'Suggestional thoughts' were inserted into his brain, hypnotizing him and causing him to pull the trigger. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 12:47 pm
Especially in a murder case, where there's a lot at stake.Plus, although Justice Greenwood's opinion doesn't mention it, I think there may also be a fairness principle at stake here. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 12:14 pm
And now returns from whence it came.And, fortunately, the latest opinion (by Justice Scotland) continues to use the phrase "bag whore". 'Cause you can't say that term too many times in an opinion, I say.Just a reminder: A bag whore is someone who trades sex for drugs. [read post]