Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 1,806
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2013, 12:16 pm
Janis Joplin sang, “Lord, won’t you buy me a Mercedes Benz”; the law rightly did not require her to sing, “Lord, won’t you buy me a generic expensive car” instead. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 5:20 pm
Hamptons International Dubai LLC & anr v Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors heard 23 July 2010 (Eady J) Spiller v Joseph heard 26 and 27 July 2010 (Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson) [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 12:26 am
RPC Privacy Blog also notes that Lord Justice Leveson, judge of the Court of Appeal, will head the phone-hacking Inquiry. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 11:17 am
St Marylebone Property Co [1962] 2 WLR 1020 : [1962] 2 All ER 288 can be considered where House of Lords referring to Taylor v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 11:37 am
“Right of Privacy” “All people are by nature free and independent and have inalienable rights. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 11:37 am
“Right of Privacy” “All people are by nature free and independent and have inalienable rights. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 12:18 pm
Lord & Taylor, LLC v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 4:16 pm
If a claimant has lied in their pleadings or evidence, they could face contempt proceedings or a prosecution for perjury – rare, but not unheard of (see R v Jeffrey Archer and R v Jonathan Aitkin). [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 5:14 pm
The emails were distributed to 28 UK Hindu temples, members of the House of Lords, MPs and others. [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:07 am
Justice Clark read his opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 4:21 am
It includes the intrinsic worth of human beings shared by all people as well as the individual reputation of each person built upon his or her own individual achievements” (Khumalo v Holomisa [2002] ZACC 12 [27] ) There is social value in ensuring that false statements which adversely impact on a person’s reputation are corrected. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 12:08 pm
US Law and Media News It is reported that a study in the United States has found that young people care about privacy just as much as older people but behave more recklessly online because they think the law gives them more protection than it actually does. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 2:01 pm
People often do the same thing with the term "common law. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 4:35 am
They could point out to such people that they might well win under Britain’s libel laws and say, “So bring an action. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 6:15 am
As Lord Justice Romer observed in Vizetelly v Mudie’s Select Library (1900) this approach was potentially a harsh one. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 2:11 pm
From Bailey v. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 4:08 pm
On the same day the House of Lords Communications Committee will hold evidence sessions with IPSO, Hacked Off and others to discuss developments in press regulation. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 7:25 am
The Magna Carta, Parliament, Lord Coke, Blackstone, and the drafters of the U.S. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 6:30 am
Wilkins and United States v. [read post]
