Search for: "People v. Davis"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 2,258
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2015, 3:30 am
” But in Diamond v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
This was true in Rumsfeld v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 9:06 am
Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004), and Davis v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 4:43 pm
“Whether you think that this is good law or bad law, I bet most of the people in this room would say that the feel of the two songs is similar,” Davis said. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 9:55 am
Louisiana, 14-6673, and the indefinitely rescheduled Davis v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
And as the Supreme Court made clear 50 years ago in Brandenburg v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 8:20 pm
Not every gunshot ineluctably results in serious physical injury (see, People v Gray, 30 AD3d 771 [3rd Dept 2006] [victim shot with shotgun from 20 feet away, evidence insufficient to establish serious physical injury]; see also, People v Rojas, 61 NY2d 726 [1984] [gunshot injury does not by itself establish substantial pain as required for physical injury]; People v Francis, 112 AD2d 167 [2nd Dept 1985] [same]; People v… [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 12:42 am
On 18 March 2015, Nicola Davies J heard an application in the case of Lachaux v AOL Ltd. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 3:37 pm
The problem was based on United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:05 am
Washington and Davis v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am
Also, the Court has yet to set a Conference for the rescheduled Davis v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 9:29 am
See People v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
In Salazar v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 9:16 am
Davis. 2002.40 McGeorge L. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 8:15 am
” Cohen v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 2:29 pm
Supreme Court decided Davis v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm
The Court also denied cert. in Davis v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
Washington and Davis v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 11:53 am
In Baghdad, a series of attacks against crowded markets and Shiite checkpoints has left 37 people dead and wounded another 87. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 9:54 am
Davis v. [read post]
