Search for: "People v. London"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 1,929
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2013, 11:54 am
Also promoted to the Court of Appeal in the same batch of ten are Sir Geoffrey Vos (remember United Airlines v United Airways, here, Lady Gaga v Moshi Monsters, here?) [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 6:56 am
In its judgment in Core Issues Trust v. [read post]
6 Apr 2013, 1:42 am
The way he stuck at the topic, he might almost have had people thinking it was credible gossip: “Are you Pre-Op or Post-Op? [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 1:38 am
This represents a 22% rise in London alone. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:15 am
V. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 10:47 pm
Censorship exists for the good of the people! [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 11:41 am
London Borough of Brent v Tudor [2013] EWCA Civ 157This was an appeal of a Circuit Judge’s finding that LB Brent’s possession claim under Ground 16, Schedule 2 Housing Act 1985 failed because the property was reasonably needed to accommodate those living there. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 11:41 am
London Borough of Brent v Tudor [2013] EWCA Civ 157This was an appeal of a Circuit Judge’s finding that LB Brent’s possession claim under Ground 16, Schedule 2 Housing Act 1985 failed because the property was reasonably needed to accommodate those living there. [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 11:01 am
I have been provided with a note of judgment and so can give you a bit more detail.Imagine, if you will, that a large number of the good people of North London are, to put it mildly, somewhat dissatisfied with the Tory/Lib Dem cuts to public expenditure (a view, I should add, which is plainly shared by all right-thinking people). [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 11:01 am
I have been provided with a note of judgment and so can give you a bit more detail.Imagine, if you will, that a large number of the good people of North London are, to put it mildly, somewhat dissatisfied with the Tory/Lib Dem cuts to public expenditure (a view, I should add, which is plainly shared by all right-thinking people). [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 9:24 am
London Borough of Islington v The Unite Group Plc [2013] EWHC 508 (Admin)This is an interesting appeal in relation to the counting of storeys for HMO licensing purposes. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 9:24 am
London Borough of Islington v The Unite Group Plc [2013] EWHC 508 (Admin)This is an interesting appeal in relation to the counting of storeys for HMO licensing purposes. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 11:59 pm
If any more people had turned up we would have been stacking up in the car park. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 10:08 am
New London, voters opted for Prop 207. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 6:46 am
Michigan v. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 2:37 pm
Every year, my distinguished colleague at Penn State, Jan M. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am
Sharif v The London Borough of Camden [2013] UKSC 10Does accommodation available for occupation by a person and those reasonably expected to reside with them have to be in one unit of accommodation? [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am
Sharif v The London Borough of Camden [2013] UKSC 10Does accommodation available for occupation by a person and those reasonably expected to reside with them have to be in one unit of accommodation? [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:11 pm
Wandsworth backed away from that case, but the view of some, including me, at the time, was that the terms were effectively a personal obligation, not a term of the tenancy.We have just heard about a County Court judgment in a case, LB Wandsworth v Maggott, in Wandsworth County Court, where exactly that was held. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:11 pm
Wandsworth backed away from that case, but the view of some, including me, at the time, was that the terms were effectively a personal obligation, not a term of the tenancy.We have just heard about a County Court judgment in a case, LB Wandsworth v Maggott, in Wandsworth County Court, where exactly that was held. [read post]
