Search for: "Pounds v. United States"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 1,470
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2011, 5:30 am
For more on this topic, including the story of the one published legal opinion involving moon-rock ownership, see "United States v. [read post]
29 May 2011, 10:26 am
She wanted a pound of flesh. [read post]
29 May 2011, 9:30 am
Kowalski, now 26, was shifted to second base, but the change in position did not seem to affect his hitting as the 5’11,” 185 pound slugger came through with another exceptional season, belting out 31 doubles and 15 home runs, while batting a solid .280 in what was clearly one of the strongest Class B leagues in the country. [read post]
25 May 2011, 4:10 pm
” The authors correctly state: “[h]ard decisions need to be made, and resources committed, but an ounce of current prevention now may certainly outweigh the inevitable pound of information loss. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:14 am
As a party litigant without representation, Mr Wilson was, according to court observers, forced abroad to Japan and the United States for supportive expert medical reports. [read post]
21 May 2011, 10:45 pm
See also United States v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 3:25 pm
The United States Supreme Court issued a ruling earlier this week that gives police more latitude to enter a person's home without first obtaining a search warrant. [read post]
17 May 2011, 1:41 pm
In a landmark decision, the United States Supreme Court in Kentuckly v, King, Docket No.09-1272, held that warrantless searches are valid so long as a police officer knocks loudly, announces themselves and hears evidence being destroyed. [read post]
17 May 2011, 7:20 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
16 May 2011, 11:29 am
(See also Whren v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:48 am
NAB, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 1191 (Admin) (13 May 2011) Man unlawfully detained pending deportation to Iran awarded £75 per day (total £6,150) compensatory damages. [read post]
13 May 2011, 12:57 am
(IP finance) United Kingdom Digital Economy Act emerges from judicial review largely unscathed (IP Osgoode) (Out Law) P2P lawyer fined after £5.99 web host falls to Anonymous attacks (ArsTechnica) Small application, streamlined track: copyright licences hit the fast lane (IPKat) United States US General The PROTECT-IP Act: COICA redux (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (Public Knowledge) (Public Knowledge) (Ars Technica) (Technology Liberation Front)… [read post]
12 May 2011, 12:30 pm
In the assessment, Brent had found:(1) that no current difficulties, over and above ongoing medical care, lack of access to funds and immigration status in the United Kingdom, could be identified; (2) when Mr Coxall asked Mr Nassery what help he needed, he identified the need for help in making appointments and asked to be given £10,000. [read post]
12 May 2011, 2:59 am
I think an ounce or prevention is worth a pound of cure," he said. [read post]
10 May 2011, 8:53 am
This Kat has spent the morning reading today's decision in the Fourth Chamber of the European Court of Human rights in Mosley v United Kingdom. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:31 am
[Update] On 6 May 2011 Mr Justice Tugendhat gave judgment in the case of Bacon v Automattic [2011] EWHC 1072 (QB) – a Norwich Pharmacal application in which he held that the operators of WordPress and Wikipedia could be served with the order in the United States by Email. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 11:51 am
The case was decided by the The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 8:20 am
Iorworth HOARE v the United Kingdom – 16261/08 [2011] ECHR 722 (12 April 2011) – Read decision Potential future US president Donald Trump once said that “Everything in life is luck“. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 6:25 pm
Almost all the successful United States lawsuits against healthcare providers for unilateral withdrawal were based on a tort theory of outrage or intentional infliction of emotional distress. [read post]
