Search for: "Powers v. State" Results 1141 - 1160 of 37,174
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2007, 9:09 pm
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court issued an opinion in the case of Cunningham v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 1:16 am by landuseprof
Supreme Court granted cert on Monday to hear American Electric Power Company, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 8:06 am
American Electric Power. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 5:00 am by Samuel Estreicher
The first is what we call “the Steel Seizure principle,” after Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 5:14 pm by Adrian Vermeule
It in fact became the stated position of the Clinton administration. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 5:33 am by Matthew Waxman, Samuel Weitzman
Every student of national security law knows about Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 8:00 am by Tracy Taylor
  Accordingly, the court held that the SEC sufficiently stated a claim under Section 15(a) and therefore denied Powers’ motion to dismiss Count V of the SEC’s complaint. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 10:05 am by Big Tent Democrat
The State police power does not insulate State action from this inquiry. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 9:10 am by Associates and Bruce L. Scheiner
Taylor, Jan. 14, 2016, Washington State Supreme Court More Blog Entries: Samson v. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 7:08 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Powers, 305 U.S. 527 (1939) recognized as distinct individual rights, separate from water rights possessed by the Crow Tribe – be awarded to the Crow Tribe in negotiations between the United States, the tribe, and the State of Montana? [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 12:08 pm
Adam Levitin already posted on this week's decision in Cuomo v. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 9:00 am
This decision marks the latest action in the ongoing efforts by EPA and states to regulate greenhouse gas emissions; particularly in terms of carbon emissions from currently existing power plants. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 1:36 pm by Kevin Russell
Kavanaugh acknowledges that “[i]ndependent agencies are constitutional under Humphrey’s Executor v. the United States” before adding that “what is constitutional is not always wise. [read post]