Search for: "Re v. PERS"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 7,384
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2009, 6:05 pm
Azoogle/Epic The lawsuit against Azoogle/Epic is partially based on a miscalibrated cost-per-acquisition (CPA) deal. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:33 am
Doe and Doe v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:11 am
The Court of Appeal distinguished the principles in Foakes v Beer (1884) 9 App Cas 605 and in re Selectmove [1995] 1 WLR 474 and instead followed Williams v Roffey Bros & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd [1991] 1 QB 1. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 9:29 am
This case is the second in the past month (Southwest EFuels v. 3T in January) in which Judge Ward declined to allow a willful infringement claim to go to the jury (to be fair, the JMOL was on all infringement claims in that case, so the ruling had nothing to do with willful infringement per se), and follows a couple of other postverdict findings by Judge Ward and Judge Everingham last fall (Centocor v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 4:59 pm
Supreme Court judges think they're soooooo smart, what with their 60 Minutes interviews and all that binding precedent blah blah. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am
Russell Williams (Textiles) Ltd., [2001] 1 All E.R. 700 (H.L.), at p. 706, per Lord Hoffmann; see also Nichols v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 6:14 am
Sullivan’s to re-appeal his case according to a statement by Mr. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 10:15 am
It has long been anticipated that the Bilski v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 8:26 am
Once Barnhart re-entered the street, Stites activated his lights and sirens and pursued him. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 9:05 pm
[Time] Rest of the Economist article is of interest too, especially on ADA filing mills in Florida and elsewhere; In Sheehan v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 8:45 am
First, it provides a clear re-statement of the principle that the liberty of the subject can be interfered with only upon grounds that the court will uphold as lawful; that the power to detain must be exercised reasonably and in a manner which is not arbitrary (per Lord Hope at §§49-50). [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 8:01 am
The father wants to vaccinate the children per their pediatrician's recommendation. [read post]
10 Jun 2017, 6:45 am
Second, in Kokesh v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 12:27 pm
Negligence per se claim TwIqballed due to: failure, in a preemption cas [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 6:44 pm
By Eric Goldman Blockowicz v. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 12:16 pm
Tech Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 4:33 pm
In Little v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 6:40 am
Co. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 3:36 am
He attributed a value to Apple of US$8.235m per annum for that proportion of the Stack. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 7:00 am
In Massachusetts v. [read post]
