Search for: "Robert Jesse" Results 1141 - 1160 of 1,407
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2014, 5:43 am by Amy Howe
  At The Wall Street Journal Law Blog, Jess Bravin reports on Breyer’s comments on Judaism and justice, while Politico’s Hilary Krieger reports that Breyer “signaled Sunday that the case on same-sex marriage wasn’t totally closed despite the high court’s decision not to take up appeals on the issue earlier this session. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
For The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that in Iancu v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
Judge Jesse M. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court … “[n]ot once, but twice,” comes from Robert Barnes for The Washington Post. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 5:29 am by Joshua Matz
  At the Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin contends that the health care ruling will be “a crucible for Chief Justice John Roberts” — in a related vein, the Associated Press suggests that Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Kennedy will likely control the outcome of these cases, and Reuters focuses on the Chief Justice’s vote. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
For The Wall Street Journal (subscription required), Jess Bravin reports that “Mr. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
Additional coverage comes from Mark Matthews for The Denver Post, Jess Bravin for The Wall Street Journal, Steven Mazie for The Economist’s Espresso blog, and Robert Barnes for The Washington Post, who reports that “[t]he case’s importance is underscored by the attention it has received: 100 amicus briefs have been filed and people began camping out Friday afternoon on the sidewalk in front of the Supreme Court to secure a spot” in the courtroom for the… [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 9:04 am by Amy Howe
In The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin and Theo Francis chronicle the increase in the use of the word “friend” to refer to opposing counsel at the Court, attributing it primarily to Chief Justice John Roberts. [read post]
14 May 2020, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
” At CNN, Joan Biskupic reports that Chief Justice John Roberts “is likely to control decisions in the separation-of-powers disputes that recall landmark cases dating to the Watergate era and that raise new political challenges in today’s polarized Washington,” Trump v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 8:24 am by Eugene Volokh
Washington, historian Caroline Weber, historian Randi Weingarten, American Federation of Teachers Bari Weiss Sean Wilentz, Princeton University Garry Wills Thomas Chatterton Williams, writer Robert F. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
’” For The Wall Street Journal (subscription required), Jess Bravin and Brent Kendall report that yesterday’s cases “extend[] a line of decisions that have elevated the rights of religious exercise and the role of sectarian institutions in American society. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:46 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional coverage of the argument comes from Ephrat Livni at Quartz, Nina Totenberg at NPR and Robert Barnes and Ann Marimow for The Washington Post. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:31 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional coverage comes from Jess Bravin for The Wall Street Journal, Marcia Coyle and Tony Mauro at The National Law Journal (subscription or registration required), Adam Liptak for The New York Times, Ariane de Vogue at CNN, Robert Barnes for The Washington Post, Lawrence Hurley at Reuters, Kevin Daley at The Daily Caller, Andrew Hanna and Josh Gerstein at Politico, Lydia Wheeler at The Hill, Elizabeth Lowman at Jurist, David Savage for the Los Angeles Times, Dave… [read post]
28 May 2015, 9:00 am by Amy Howe
Garza, No. 90-849” – in a brief signed by then-Deputy Solicitor General John Roberts. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 4:09 pm by John Floyd
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts to accept, forcing the Chief Justice last November to openly rebuke the president before the entire country. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:34 am by Amanda Rice
The Washington Post’s Robert Barnes suggests that merely describing the Justices as “skeptical that corporations have ‘personal privacy’ rights” “might be an understatement. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for Forbes, Robert Alt weighs in on Janus v. [read post]