Search for: "S.C.1"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 1,303
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2008, 7:20 am
Bobby argues in the comments, To be admissible as a common scheme or plan, there should be a connection between the two acts (Molineux), that would make them a continuous transaction (Lyle in S.C.). [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm
” See Trayco of S.C. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 4:58 am
South Carolina – S.C. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 12:04 am
S.C. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 1:19 pm
Graef, 2010 ONSC 4479 (CanLII)SCOTT , J.[1] Mobility is the issue for consideration in this matter. [read post]
15 May 2019, 7:33 pm
Lokensgard, U.W. 1993, is a shareholder with Godfrey & Kahn, S.C., in Appleton, where he practices corporate, public finance, and commercial real estate law. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 11:00 am
P’ship, 240 S.C. 367, 375 (2000)). [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 2:08 pm
.” Padilla was held in a Navy brig in Charleston, S.C., for nearly four years, after he had been designated an “enemy combatant” on direct order of President George Bush. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 10:00 pm
S.C. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 10:00 pm
S.C. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm
Mar. 1, 1980) (anesthetic). [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
American Home Products Corp., 595 S.E.2d 493, 496 (S.C. 2004).Texas: Humble Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 4:30 am
Those efforts failing, not until the electronic records provisions of the Canada Evidence Act, ss. 31.1 to 31.8, came into force on May 1, 2000, as Part 3 of the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act, S.C. 2000, c. 5, s. 56 (PIPEDA), along with their 10 provincial and territorial counterparts, has there been significant revision and updating of the law of evidence by statute, or adequate provision for electronically-stored records as evidence. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 1:07 pm
Effective February 1, 2020, Texas Medicaid & Healthcare Partnership (TMHP)[7] now takes the position that: “After-hours procedures are limited to one per day, same provider. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 4:30 am
Dealing with Lawyers 1. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 8:11 am
The Debtor reported business income on line 12 of his tax returns for 2006, 2007 and 2008 (line 12, form 1040, Debtors' ex. 1), claimed a business expense for car and truck expenses on each of those tax returns (line 9, Sch C, Debtors' ex. 1), identified the truck used in his business as a 2006 Chevrolet Silverado, and designated between 75% and 100% of the Vehicle's use to be attributable to his business. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:00 am
1 [Recovery of Damages for Lost Profits]§ 1.6, at 17. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
Law Society of Upper Canada[1] and revised following the Supreme Court’s decision in Alberta (Education) v. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
Part 1 presented the proposition that the great amount of “emergency relief-type” activity and literature that has been produced by the many access to justice agencies (A2J agencies) in relation to the “A2J problem” of unaffordable lawyers’ services, is: (1) deflecting attention from the great need to solve it; and, (2) it is assisting law societies and governments in the creation of a false appearance of an adequate response to the A2J problem. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Well, eliminating that kind of mutual ignorance is one of the things that this blog’s all about, so we thought we’d take a look at how §2 of the Third Restatement is faring these days.We see three important issues wrapped up in the Third Restatement – these being, (1) risk/utility balancing as the basic means of assessing liability, (2) the requirement of a feasible alternative design, and (3) employment of negligence-based “reasonableness" as the test. [read post]
