Search for: "SELLERS v. STATE"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 3,988
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2018, 8:29 am
Whereas the Seller in Hendry v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 8:29 am
Whereas the Seller in Hendry v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 6:00 am
This duty could be extrapolated from Williams v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 3:51 am
Wayfair, which cleared the way for states to require out-of-state retailers who don’t have a store or warehouse in the state to collect tax on sales to state residents, “is not so much the end of the story as it is the opening of a new chapter in the long-running saga of state efforts to collect sales taxes on goods purchased from out-of-state sellers. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
The 1938 ruling in United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 5:12 am
Complete Auto Remains the Rule, As Modified by Wayfair The South Dakota v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm
Last month, though, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in South Dakota v. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 1:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 12:53 pm
In the cases found on Pacer, such as Sheppard et al v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 12:00 pm
In a release dated July 11, State Tax Commissioner Ryan Rauschenberger indicated that the sellers will be required to collect beginning on October 1, 2018 after the Supreme Court's decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 5:15 pm
If a seller of commercial real estate is not a resident of California, they must disclose this to state tax authorities. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 5:15 pm
If a seller of commercial real estate is not a resident of California, they must disclose this to state tax authorities. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 8:22 am
Mills v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 11:33 am
(Other state laws may also apply, such as NY’s consumer protection act as interpreted by the People v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 7:00 am
The case (South Dakota v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 2:58 am
Justice Scarpulla’s decision agreed with the Green estate’s position in critical part, stating that while the “evidence here depicts a transaction that, to the objective observer, may raise a concern as to the transaction’s fairness,” the Gourary estate failed to submit evidence adequate to support its claims: Unfortunately, the key players to the subject transaction passed away before they could provide any probative evidence. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm
In Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 6:42 am
Gibson v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 1:57 pm
” Talbot v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 12:30 pm
Examples include: Evidence in the Doe v. [read post]
