Search for: "SMITH v. SMITH" Results 1141 - 1160 of 16,211
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2020, 12:32 pm
  (To be clear:  I mention Judge Smith's first name because there are two "Smith's" on the Ninth Circuit, but there's only one "Callahan," which is why I don't mention her first name. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 9:44 pm by Patent Docs
Perhaps one reason for this less predictable negative outcome in these technologies is the countervailing (to some extent) deference the Federal Circuit has been compelled to give Patent and Trademark Office decisions on factual questions (see Dickinson v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 10:00 pm by Patricia Salkin
Smith Communications, LLC v Washington County, Arkansas, 2015 WL 2193027 (8th Cir. 5/12/2015) The opinion can be accessed at: http://media.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/15/05/142512P.pdfFiled under: Current Caselaw, Wireless Communications [read post]
23 May 2013, 12:25 pm
This past March, Florida’s Second District Court of Appeals tackled an important issue in the case of Smith v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 10:00 pm
The Smiths and Judge Moore were certainly trailblazers, paving the way for legal precedent supporting the LGBTQ+ community for years to follow.The full text of the decision can be found here: Smith v Avanti. [read post]
23 Jan 2021, 2:07 am
Audiencia Nacional, MadridAuthor FDV Licence  CC BY-SA 4.0 Source Wikipedia Jane LambertPatents Court (Mr Justice Marcus Smith) Top Optimized Technologies SL and another v Vodafone Group Services Ltd and others [2021] EWHC 46 (Pat) (14 Jan 2021)This was an application by Vodafone Group Services Limited, Vodafone Group plc and Vodafone Limited ("Vodafone") to stay, either on jurisdictional grounds [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:37 pm
Author Simon Speed  Copyright waived by author Jane Lambert Chancery Division (Mr Justice Marcus Smith) Centek Holdings Ltd and others  v Giles [2020] EWHC 1682 (Ch) (26 June 2020) The shillelaghs shown above are known as tipstaves. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 4:32 pm
Jane Lambert Court of Appeal (Lords Justices Floyd, Males and Arnold) Neurim Pharmaceuticals (1991) Ltd and another v Generics UK Ltd (t/a Mylan) and another [2020] EWCA Civ 793 (24 June 2020) This was an appeal by the claimants, Neurim Pharmaceuticals (1991) Ltd ("Neurim") and its exclusive licensee Flynn Pharma Ltd ("Flynn"), against Mr Justice Marcus Smith's refusal in Neurim [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:39 am by Immigration Prof
Here is the latest Ninth Circuit opinion (Judge William Fletcher, Marsha Berzon, and Milan Smith) on the Trump administration's... [read post]