Search for: "STAND et al. v. STATE."
Results 1141 - 1160
of 2,184
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2020, 3:46 pm
] Today a divided panel of the Sixth Circuit decided Gary et al v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 12:20 am
In the meanwhile, a much quieter, but much starker drama unfolds in the wake of Pretty , Purdy et al. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 6:30 am
(The case is EPIC, et al. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 10:57 am
Doe v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 9:32 am
Metzger, et al. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 11:08 am
HICKS, ET AL.; from Anderson County;14th district (14? [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 1:51 pm
National Football League et al., case number 08-66, struck a significant blow to the long-standing joint venture between the National Football League (NFL) and its 32 member teams to license and market team-owned trademarks through a single entity. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 10:42 am
Yesterday, in the case of Doe, et al. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 7:43 am
In McCullen et. al. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 5:04 am
EnCana Oil & Gas (USA) et al v. [read post]
14 Dec 2008, 11:07 pm
The suit is Jegart et al v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 8:48 am
Clayton County, Georgia, No. 17-1618, a consolidated case with No. 17–1623, Altitude Express, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:46 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 3:57 am
"Much depends on Dura’s credibility," the court said, stating it was possible a jury could see Dura’s explanation as a pretext, or find that the drug test had targeted information about employees' physical or mental health, regardless of Dura’s stated intent.But it was not a matter of law that Dura violated the ADA.The case is Bates et al. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 2:21 am
Peter Guntz, later became a judge at the EPO.During the Apple v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 6:13 am
” The lawsuit (The People of the State of New York v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 9:48 am
As I’ve said previously, I don’t see how Kay et al can stand in the face of this consistent line of jurisprudence from the ECtHR and Paulic should provide further encouragement for those who seek to have the Supreme Court reconsider (as a panel of 9?) [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 2:45 pm
” Plaintiffs-Appellants’ Consolidated Reply Brief at 2, City of Oakland, et al v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 2:45 pm
” Plaintiffs-Appellants’ Consolidated Reply Brief at 2, City of Oakland, et al v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:08 am
Second Chance Body Armor, Inc., et al, No. 1:04-cv-00280, mem. op. [read post]
