Search for: "STANFORD v. STATE"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 2,042
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2012, 5:22 am
PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v SSHD, W & BB v SSHD and Z, G, U & Y v SSHD, heard 30 – 31 January 2012. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 8:10 am
Capitol Anesthesiology, P.C., et al. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 4:25 pm
An Inquiry into the Merits of Copyright: The Challenges of Consistency, Consent and Encouragement Theory, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 41, No. 6, 1989, Wendy J. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm
Karlan a Stanford law professor currently working at the Department of Justice. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 6:50 pm
Plaintiffs (represented by the Center for Internet and Society at Stanford Law School — good work!!!) [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 3:00 am
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 10:38 am
This series is part of Lawfare's collaboration with the Stanford-MIT Healthy Elections Project. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 2:17 pm
Articles about the First Amendment, state constitutional free speech provisions, federal and state statutes, common-law rules, and regulations protecting or restricting speech, or private organizations' speech regulations. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 8:24 am
She was the lead CJA attorney on the Yousuf v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 9:39 am
Moderated and organized by Hank Greely of Stanford Law School, the panel brought together: Steven Greenberg, whose efforts to introduce neuroscience on psychopathic disorder (psychopathy) in capital sentencing in Illinois of Brian Dugan has garnered attention from Nature to The Chicago Tribune; Houston Gordon (an old-school trial attorney successful enough not to need his own website, hence no hyperlink), who has made the most assertive arguments so far to admit fMRI lie-detection evidence… [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 3:28 am
Goldstein, a partner at Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson, writes that the Senate's ratification of the Convention Against Corruption, the Second Circuit's dismissal of an an interlocutory appeal in U.S. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 3:05 pm
Stanford Daily. [read post]
Justices Argue over text (and Ceviche) in Ruling that Alaska Native Corporations are “Indian Tribes”
28 Jun 2021, 11:50 am
The case, Yellen v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 3:56 am
” At Stanford Law School’s Legal Aggregate blog, Robert Gordon suggests that the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Lamps Plus Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 6:12 pm
Credit Suisse is a party in Billing v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 10:59 am
United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001), Justice Scalia applied the rule first formulated in Katz v. [read post]
28 May 2023, 6:00 am
Brown v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 9:22 am
Frye and Lafler v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 9:03 pm
., the Court will hear a state case, Riley v. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 6:10 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
