Search for: "STATE v ROLL"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 4,415
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2011, 8:14 pm
Judge Posner then stated – and this is where Dukes, et al. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 7:45 am
But recently, we caught word that the state is unlawfully purging voters from the rolls, so on December 17, the ACLU of Ohio and Demos sent a letter to the Ohio secretary of state indicating that they intend to initiate litigation within 90 days if this unlawful purge is not discontinued. [read post]
24 May 2016, 3:57 am
,United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 7:32 am
By Craig JarvisLay v. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 11:58 am
(Gross v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 4:03 pm
Amant v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 4:36 am
Dukes v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 1:53 pm
The justices granted the states’ petition in Arizona v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 7:24 am
In its long-anticipated decision in Brinker v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 4:24 am
Branham v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 7:08 am
See Alexander v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 10:17 am
LawLawLaw #43: Technology, Law, Baseball, Rock ‘n’ Roll. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am
Over the last month, on our New Republic: Security States newsfeed, we rolled out a series designed to explain why fairly allocating the costs of software deficiencies between software makers and users is so critical to addressing the growing problem of vulnerability-ridden code—and how such a regime will require questioning some of our deep-seated beliefs about the very nature of software security. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 3:36 am
In Austin v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 2:53 pm
The problem here was the high threshold of evidence set out in R (Unison) v Lord Chancellor [2014] EWHC 218 (Admin), reported at [2014] ICR 498, R (Tabbakh) v Staffordshire and West Midlands Probation Trust [2014] EWCA Civ 827, and the second Unison case, R (Unison) v Lord Chancellor (No. 2) [2014] EWHC 4198 (Admin). [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 3:14 pm
On May 14, 2018, the United States Supreme Court decided the pivotal matter of Murphy v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 7:43 am
Barron v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 12:02 am
Rolls, [1996] B.C.J. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 12:03 pm
Reference: People v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 3:47 pm
Its opinion in the Brown v. [read post]
