Search for: "STEWART v. STATE"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 2,310
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2014, 2:42 am
Birlinn Limited. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2014, 6:55 am
On Friday, Zoe Bedell summarized the recent decision of the European Court of Human Rights on extraditions to the United States: Trabelsi v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 9:51 am
Abbott Town of Atherton v. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
In dissent in Petrella v. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 8:53 am
That's Spokeo v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 8:34 am
But see State v. [read post]
23 Aug 2014, 7:00 am
Jack noted the politics at play in the lack of congressional authorization for the use of force against the Islamic State. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 2:28 pm
For a very similar example, consider United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 5:00 am
” Jacobellis v. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 6:00 am
Stewart Baker shared the Steptoe Cyberlaw Podcast. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 7:38 am
” What constitutes a “reasoned decision” is difficult to put into an exact definition (I am reminded of the old definition of pornography as stated by Supreme Court Justice, Potter Stewart, “I know it when I see it”). [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 10:00 pm
But with the case of the United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
Circuit Court’s en banc opinion in United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
United States (1971) and United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 10:03 pm
United States. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 1:50 pm
Henry, et al. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 6:55 am
Circuit Court released a few notable opinions this week: on Monday, it announced its ruling in United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
” Following the Supreme Court’s Burwell v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 6:38 am
Neither a franchise agreement nor the economic realities test supported a finding that an owner/franchisor, by merely providing advice to a struggling franchisee, acted as the employer of its cook, the Fifth Circuit ruled, overturning a jury verdict and finding the owner/franchisor was entitled to judgment as a matter of law (Orozco v Plackis, July 3, 2014, Stewart, C). [read post]
