Search for: "STRANGE v. STATE" Results 1141 - 1160 of 2,234
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2015, 1:52 pm by Rick Garnett
We in the United States have committed ourselves – not only through our Constitution, but also through a variety of state and federal laws and policies – to religious freedom. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Orin Kerr
In a recent post here at Lawfare, April Doss argues that the Ninth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 8:26 am by Nassiri Law
Additional Resources: Measure loosens discipline disclosure requirements for California state workers, July 13, 2015, The State Worker More Blog Entries: Arlington v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 12:29 pm by Garrett Hinck
Senators told senior State Department officials that it should have opened the Accountability Review Board inquiry much earlier to look into the strange illnesses that afflicted U.S. diplomats serving in Cuba. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 1:40 pm by Josh Blackman
Granted, this is not a normal case, but a decision invalidating this most recent proclamation will look strange to a law student reading the decision in a casebook 25 years from now. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 5:09 pm
So imagine my glee upon reading the (sadly unpublished) opinion in Miller v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 1:05 am by Ken Lammers
Not to be deterred, the Court of Appeals has tried again in Taylor v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:36 am
 Nevertheless, I still find myself strangely attracted to LLSV. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 3:18 pm by Don Cruse
Supreme Court handled these split opinions (what is, strangely enough, called “the Marks rule”). [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 5:27 pm by John Borland
Written to affect the very Siemens components used at Iran’s facilities, some analysts have even speculated it may have been the work of a state, rather than of traditional underground virus writers. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The Supreme Court and the New Challenge to the ACA As Professor Michael Dorf explained in his Verdict column yesterday, the Supreme Court has agreed to hear a new challenge to the ACA, King v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 9:12 pm by David Lat
They point out that this is 3M’s third bite at the apple — the company previously filed two similar cases in New York state court. [read post]