Search for: "Sellers v. United States"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 1,425
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2021, 12:44 am
Ericsson also asked for and obtained an indemnity in case the Wuhan Court fines Ericsson for participating in its US case or asserting its United States patent rights for the amount of the fine. [read post]
31 May 2012, 6:09 am
In 1996, the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission issued joint guidance in their Statements of Antitrust Enforcement Policy in Health Care. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 12:06 pm
These issues were evident in Lynch v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:30 pm
Kwikset Corporation v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 4:26 am
Farah v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 12:49 pm
Select Additional Sources Shortland, Anja, Lost Art: The Art Loss Register Casebook Vol I (2021) at page 9 ↑ ibid, at page 39 ↑ Cases discussed in this chapter by Shortland: United States of America v. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 10:08 pm
Simultaneously, the defendants filed a suit in the United States District Court, asserting non-infringement of the plaintiffs’ rights. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 12:49 pm
According to the solicitor general of the U.S. in Goldman Sachs Group Inc. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 3:22 am
The plaintiffs contended that because they had completed the swap contracts transactions in the United States, the swap transactions represented “domestic transactions” within the meaning of the “second prong” of the Supreme Court’s holding in Morrison v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 7:47 pm
” Baffa v. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 8:00 am
Moore v. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 8:30 pm
The 2016 Colorado Computer Crime Case Of People v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 8:00 am
Global - Patents Open Innovation Network unveils Linux Defenders to protect open source from patent suits by establishing prior art and participating in patent peer review (Ars Technica) (Securing Innovation) Bulgaria RARBG, ArenaBG and other BitTorrent trackers forced to shut down or relocate following police action (TorrentFreak) (TorrentFreak) Cameroon Third-level domain names come to Cameroon (Afro-IP) Canada Copyright Board… [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Details emerge of secret ACTA negotiation: privacy, P2P major targets (KEI) (Michael Geist) (Excess Copyright) (Techdirt) (Ars Technica) New Zealand three strikes law comes into effect after 28 February (Ars Technica) (ZDNet) (Techdirt) Global Global - General Job security and data security (ZDNet) Global - Copyright… [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:46 am
Constitution which provides that, “The United States shall … protect each [state] against invasion. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 9:12 pm
In Brown Shoe v. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 10:38 pm
The court also rejected the plaintiff’s assertion that the so-called “Kovel privilege” (United States v Kovel, 296 F2d 918 [2d Cir 1961]) attaches to the valuation report “because the purpose of the report was not to facilitate or clarify communications between plaintiff and his attorneys. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 6:00 am
: Kapur’s application (PatLit) United States US General Microsoft IP boss promoted to Executive VP role (IAM) Herdict – web-based tool collecting aggregate data on web blocking and filtering (Public Knowledge) US General – Decisions Clickwrap binding despite claim of no opportunity to read terms: Via Viente Taiwan LP v United Parcel Service, Inc (Internet Cases) US General – Lawsuits and… [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 9:47 pm
Under title 15 of the United States Code, it is unlawful for a person to engage in short selling that is “in contravention of such rules and regulations as the Commission may prescribe as necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of investors. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm
(Public Knowledge) Michael Geist presentation: ACTA – The state of play (Michael Geist) Australia I thought cats were colour blind… Federal Court confirms Mars has exclusive right to use colour ‘Whiskas purple’ for cat food: Mars Australia Pty Ltd (formerly Effem Foods Pty Ltd) v Société des Produits Nestlé SA (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) FCAFC: On appeal, simulated flames from direct light found infringing: Bitech… [read post]
