Search for: "Spells v. State"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 2,273
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2012, 5:59 pm
Brown v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 11:23 am
Such a non-categorical approach was recently used by the 9th Circuit in United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 9:58 am
So fat chance fixing the Constitution, whether by amendment or a convention as spelled out in Article V of the Constitution. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 7:06 am
He even worked for the tribal government for a spell. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 7:39 am
Indeed, it may spell professional ruin for a defendant, even if the defendant is ultimately vindicated. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 4:53 am
See U.S. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 10:00 am
’” Id. at *8 (quoting Unites States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:02 pm
Perez (11-713), on redistricting the state house, Perry v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 8:29 am
His order blocking enforcement is now under review by the Justices in the case of United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 4:00 am
He also relies on United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 7:18 am
In Arriaga v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 8:49 am
In Haiss v Ball, the offers to settle were Civil Procedure Rules (CPR), Part 36 offers. [read post]
20 May 2010, 1:54 pm
United States and Katzenbach v. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 8:23 am
by Dennis Crouch Masimo Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 2:17 pm
Similarly, what was notable in Fulton v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 9:13 am
Rev. 867, 877 (1994) (In 1791, “[e]very state limited jury service to men; every state except Vermont restricted jury service to property owners or taxpayers; three states permitted only whites to serve; and one state, Maryland, disqualified atheists”); Taylor v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 1:17 pm
., v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
The rulings, if not overturned on appeal, spell an end to California’s board diversity requirements as currently framed. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 2:02 pm
Yesterday the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit released its opinion in Latif v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 11:54 am
The Court’s decision in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
