Search for: "State v. C. G. B."
Results 1141 - 1160
of 2,345
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2014, 7:20 am
It is a 2003, Texas Supreme Court case styled, Sink v. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 11:59 am
’” The Second Circuit Court of Appeals on August 20, 2018 reinforced this recognition by remanding a guilty plea conviction in United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 11:16 am
§ 78dd-2, which states: § 78dd–2. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 11:02 am
Other states are still a work in progress, though they have been moving toward embracing international standards: e.g., Paraguay. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:31 am
P. 166a(c); Browning v. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:31 am
P. 166a(c); Browning v. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 7:17 am
” 750 ILCS 5/609.2(b) Is The Move Even Far Enough To Qualify As A Relocation? [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:30 am
In November 2018, a North Carolina court clerk advised the Surrogate’s Court that a North Carolina court had determined (a) North Carolina to be a “significant-connection state” under UAGPPJA, and (b) New York to be J.D.S. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 10:35 am
Chief Justice John G. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 5:22 pm
--An eligible person described in this subsection is-- (1) an individual who is-- (A) a citizen or legal resident of the United States; or (B) a member of a group that includes citizens or legal residents of the United States; or (2) an entity that is incorporated and maintains its primary place of business in the United States. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 2:37 pm
AE 092 (Classified) g. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 12:32 pm
Quebec invoked it routinely under the Parti Québécois as a form of political protest, and then notably in 1988, following the Supreme Court of Canada decision Ford v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 4:06 pm
V. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 4:06 pm
V. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 9:00 pm
The authors wrote, “The maximum observed log reduction of L. monocytogenes was 2.15 ± 0.04 for balsamic vinegar (50% (v/v)), 1.18 ± 0.06 for white wine vinegar ((50% (v/v)) and 1.13 ± 0.06 for acetic acid ((50% (v/v)). [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 11:13 pm
B is for Black v. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 6:12 pm
"b. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
Where the home or former home is an asset of the trust, it is not subject to the exemptions of 130 CMR 520.007(G)(2) or 520.007(G)(8). [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 1:48 pm
(Goldstein v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 2:50 pm
See United States v. [read post]
