Search for: "State v. Cohen"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 2,349
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2007, 11:41 am
Today's Supreme Court decision in Scott v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 10:30 pm
See Clark v. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 6:58 pm
Cohen [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 3:59 am
Kleeman v Rheingold, 81 NY2d 270; Caruso, Caruso & Branda, P.C. v Hirsch, 41 AD3d 407; Cohen v Wallace & Minchenberg, 39 AD3d 691; Cummings v Donovan, 36 AD3d 648; Kotzian v McCarthy, 36 AD3d 863), while others hold that it must be "a" proximate cause of damages (Bauza v Livington, 40 AD3d 791, 793; see e.g. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 9:00 pm
In a report we released last year, we outlined why the reasoning underlying these laws is constitutionally suspect: In Quill Corp. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
People v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 2:32 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in NetChoice v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 8:21 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 3:20 am
Cohen, 23 Misc. 3d 1110 (A), 886 N.Y.S.2d 66 (Table), 2009 WL 997517, at *3 (S. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 1:46 pm
In the case of United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2017, 9:00 am
FDA states that 510(k) submitters may request information on their 510(k) review status 90 days after the initial log-in date of the 510(k). [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 11:46 am
" Loving v. [read post]
22 Sep 2018, 9:00 am
However, federal law is worth review as it may be persuasive to state authorities. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 5:13 am
Aside from various procedural arguments, Cohen argued that the amended complaint failed to state a viable claim against him because it lacked any allegation that Cohen personally received a distribution of any money or assets of LiveLive. [read post]
30 May 2021, 4:06 am
In Jones we also once again saw the Court of Criminal Appeals’ jailhouse-lawyer hijacking of this sentence from the Supreme Court’s 1971 Cohen v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm
Although the Supreme Court’s overturning of Roe v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 2:29 pm
Presumably, this rule would not apply to directors who have obtained written releases, but the Sacha Baron Cohen’s of the world should be concerned about this. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 7:46 pm
Whether a party has the right to an immediate appeal under the collateral order doctrine, as set forth in Cohen v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 8:50 am
Robbins (1983.) 148 Cal.App.3d 374, 391 [plaintiff improperly alleged a separate cause of action for punitive damages instead of pleading the. statutory language in the negligence and strict liability causes of action]; Cohen v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 7:45 am
See, e.g., Hill v. [read post]
