Search for: "State v. Deal"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 29,377
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2010, 3:07 pm
" The Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of the breach of contract claim because the complaint failed to allege the defendant promised the plaintiff it would restrict competing gift stores to four stores.Analyzing the claim for breach of express and implied covenants, the Court of Appeals stated "an implied covenant to refrain from destructive competition may be inferred from a percentage lease, based on the duty of good faith and fair dealing, where the intentions… [read post]
2 May 2023, 6:30 pm
State, a case that presents interesting issues of how courts deal with lesser included offenses. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 2:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 6:46 am
Jackson v. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 10:05 am
Microsoft v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 11:00 am
Yang (Montclair State University, Department of Accounting, Law and Taxation), Foreign Tax Credit versus Foreign Earned Income Exclusion Under the New Law: This paper deals with the recent new law concerning foreign earned income exclusion and foreign housing cost allowance exclusion. [read post]
11 Aug 2007, 4:08 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 10:57 am
There are two cases for argument in the United States Supreme Court's October Term that may be of interest to creditors- Ransom v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 2:54 pm
(David Kopel) So said the unanimous Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 8:55 am
State v. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 10:19 pm
United States, an important case dealing with freedom of speech in the context of social media. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 8:38 am
Padilla One More Time: Facebook Isn’t a State Actor–Atkinson v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 11:49 am
More on eyewitness ID from the states will be in the next post. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 9:53 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 9:56 am
Here is the complaint (Download US v Servicers), but to give you a flavor the suit alleges, among other things, failing to discharge underwriting obligations, failing to do modification underwriting, losing the paperwork, failing to train or maintain sufficient staff to deal with the modification processes, allowing borrowers to stay in trial modifications for excessive periods of time, wrongfully denying modifications, misleading consumers in connection with modifications,… [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 2:45 pm
The Court does not agree with the prosecution: If Congress were to take up the enterprise of criminalizing "undisclosed self-dealing by a public official or private employee," it would have to employ standards of sufficient definiteness and specificity to overcome due process concerns. [read post]
15 May 2012, 6:24 am
Vulcan Materials; dual-class share structures and director accountability; go-shop provisions and deal protection devices; process issues in approving mergers and appropriate remedies; the use of poison pills following Airgas v. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 8:16 am
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Davis v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 1:26 pm
State. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 2:31 pm
The New Deal today: Wickard v. [read post]
