Search for: "State v. Drew"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 2,862
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2023, 6:58 am
In Skinner v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 3:04 pm
The OPM guidance issued Friday was noteworthy in that it drew no distinction between legally married gay and lesbian employees living in states that permit them to marry, or in states that still forbid such unions. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 1:26 pm
Co. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 6:10 pm
And finally, we have a revised opinion in United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:31 am
Fox v. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 4:37 pm
Wang responded that Congress chose its words and drew bright-line rules in the detention statute. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 8:35 am
The court drew this emphasis on “neutrality” from ambiguous language in the Roommates.com en banc opinion. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 3:00 am
A. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 5:16 am
In addition to the normal factors to consider when determining if there was likelihood of confusion (global appreciation, assessment through the eyes of the reasonably well informed and circumspect average consumer, etc.), Hacon J drew particular attention to Maier v ASOS plc [2015] EWCA Civ 220 (see IPKat analysis here). [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 5:40 am
But one recent ruling out of that court seems to be getting little notice: Utah v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 1:59 pm
In Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 10:29 am
The court relied on a previous case, State v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:21 am
Justice Breyer with opinion in Harris v. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 9:20 am
“[United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 3:18 am
In his famous concurrence in Youngstown Sheet v. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 5:58 pm
It is intended to complement our United States: Monthly Round Up posts. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 7:50 am
* Handshoe v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
And Blackmun’s second draft (after reargument) initially drew the line after the first trimester (three months). [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 6:35 pm
First up was Byrd v. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 7:47 am
On July 27, 2012, a jury in the matter of Michael Galliher v. [read post]
