Search for: "State v. Henderson" Results 1141 - 1160 of 1,185
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2007, 10:00 pm
Eric Fues at Finnegan Henderson recently wrote a great article (originally published in Patent World in June 07) about the utility of USITC proceedings in light of the US Supreme Court's May 2006 decision in eBay v MercExchange (which, if you have not been following US patent law, made it harder to obtain injunctions in patent cases).The USITC (United States International Trade Commission) is the US border protection agency, or, in the words of the USITC: An… [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 10:06 am
The case under discussion today has the truly odd name of USA v. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 9:41 am
Let us start today with an August 3, 2007 decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia -- the court that Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and John Roberts sat on before they were anointed to the Supreme Court as a reward for their reactionaryism -- in a case called Abigail Alliance For Better Access To Developmental Drugs v. von Eschenbach . [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 8:23 am
HarbourtOn June 8, 2007, a three judge panel of the District of Columbia Court of Appeal issued a decision in NRDC v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 3:30 pm
Roger Falk and Christopher Hughes won in State v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 1:03 am
Richard Franco BRONX COUNTYConsumer Protection Court Recalls, Vacates Prior Approval of Transfer Of Structured Settlement Payment Rights Matter of 321 Henderson Receivables Origination LLC v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 11:04 am
Sea Pines Co., 692 F.2d 973, 976-77 (4th Cir. 1982) (stating that "when the corporation becomes insolvent, the fiduciary duty of the directors shifts from the stockholders to the creditors"); Henderson v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 1:09 am
Richard Franco BRONX COUNTYConsumer ProtectionCourt Recalls, Vacates Prior Approval of Transfer Of Structured Settlement Payment Rights Matter of 321 Henderson Receivables Origination LLC v. [read post]
15 May 2007, 12:52 am
However, subsequent to Mendez, the United States Supreme Court stated, albeit in dicta, that "courts have been accorded discretion to enlarge the 120-day period ‘even if there is no good cause shown.' " Henderson v. [read post]