Search for: "State v. Investors Security Corporation"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 1,318
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2011, 5:41 am
This essay explores the possible dual readings of AT&T v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Gloucester County School Board v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 9:00 am
Here's what happens if a shifty promoter tries to skirt securities exchange regulations protecting investors, as per 15 USCS § 78cc: (a) Waiver provisions. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 6:17 pm
(US v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 7:26 am
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are the two biggest home mortgage investing companies in the United States.[8] The two government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) are privately-owned corporations authorized to make loans and loan guarantees.[9] The two giants operate in American's secondary mortgage market to ensure that mortgage bankers and other lenders have enough funds to lend to home buyers at lower rates.[10] The GSEs purchase… [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s decision in Royal Brush Manufacturing v. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 5:14 am
” Part and parcel of this is considering the differing obligations that the adviser may have as to voting the same security for different clients or different types of clients (such as mutual funds, pooled investment vehicles, and individual investors). [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 8:57 pm
It was Corzine's stated goal to transform MF Global from a commodity broker into an investment bank with a large proprietary trading operation similar to the one Corzine ran at Goldman in the 1990s. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
" Vice Chancellor Donald Parsons, Jr.: "Delaware decisions like Caremark and Stone v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 3:55 pm
In a prominent insider trading case, Dirks v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 12:04 pm
The order instituting proceedings against Gupta further alleges that he stood to profit from these trades because he was an investor in Galleon funds. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 5:55 pm
For instance, because of the collapse of the short term debt market, the New York Jets, Giants, and Dallas Cowboys' debt costs have increased substantially. [20] The problem is that a large portion of the clubs' debts are auction rate securities. [21] Auction rate securities are long term securities that banks hold weekly or monthly auctions to set their rates and give the holders, usually corporations or wealthy individuals, the option to sell the… [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 7:37 pm
SEC and in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 9:01 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission’s (the “SEC”) Division of Enforcement continued to focus on cybersecurity and artificial intelligence (“AI”) disclosures. [read post]
4 Jun 2016, 8:23 am
State of Delaware as a guide when determining the presence of “excessive” restrictions. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 3:00 am
May 23, 2008) (indemnification for non-merits dismissal of federal civil action granted prior to resolution of related state court action), where the courts emphasized the important role of indemnification in securing qualified persons to serve on corporate boards. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
Issues raised in our current list include district courts’ ability to amend incorrect sentences, the constitutionality of appointments to a patent appeals board, the validity of the “automatic companion” rule under the Fourth Amendment, the statute of limitations in securities fraud claims, whether state criminal convictions require jury unanimity, and many (many, many) others. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 9:27 am
The court granted the SEC’s summary judgment motion in part, holding that the defendants had offered and sold unregistered securities since it found that TerraUSD, LUNA and MIR tokens were investment contracts under United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 8:20 am
This comes from Pearson v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 9:30 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced fraud charges against 27 individuals and entities, including three public companies, seven stock promotion firms, and two corporate CEOs, alleging that they engaged in stock promotion schemes that disguised promotional materials as unbiased analyses intended to mislead potential investors. [read post]
