Search for: "State v. Law" Results 1141 - 1160 of 173,827
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Noah Rosenblum, NYU Law, discusses Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 3:31 pm by Daniel M. Kowalski
If Texas were correct, all of these programs would have violated federal law. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 1:51 pm by Guest Author
  The Court went on to hold that Chevron was irreconcilable with the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), which states that courts “shall decide all relevant questions of law”. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 11:06 am by Seth Davis
Moreover, New Jersey state law requires public utilities to reduce their natural gas usage—which FERC arbitrarily disregarded because it had misinterpreted state law. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 11:00 am by Joseph L. Hyde
In an opinion essay published on Monday in the Washington Post, President Biden, called for a constitutional amendment to overrule the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 8:56 am by Laura
He stated: “In my view the father’s presentation before me was sensible, honest and reliable…. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 8:07 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
  The order from 26 April 2024 in AIM Sport Development AG v Supponor (UPC CoA 500/2023) demonstrated gold-medal deadline flexibility. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 7:42 am by Holly
  The USPTO guidance is consistent with the Federal Circuit’s decision in Thaler v. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 6:30 am by ernst
That judgment, now nearly two centuries old, is Judge Thomas Ruffin’s infamous opinion for the North Carolina Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
While states’ rights often involved slavery and white supremacy, states’ rights and state sovereignty were also invoked to defend the rights of northern citizens to resist efforts to enforce the Fugitive Slave laws. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 4:51 am by Jon L. Gelman
It emphasizes that state laws when uniformly applied and without protectionist motives, can regulate economic activities within their jurisdictions even if they have extraterritorial effects.New Jersey Staffing Alliance v. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 4:05 am by SHG
While some, if not many, would argue that the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
During the first week of constitutional law as conventionally taught in most American law schools (and as I teach it), students learn that, in the words of Chief Justice John Marshall speaking for the Supreme Court in Marbury v. [read post]