Search for: "State v. Lessing" Results 1141 - 1160 of 38,846
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2018, 11:05 am by JB
As of today, a federal judge and the President of the United States support the result in Texas v. [read post]
30 May 2015, 7:29 am by Burton A. Padove
Per the applicable parenting time credit he received under state guidelines, his child support obligation would have fallen just below $60 a week, or slightly less than $240 a month. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 9:46 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) I’ve blogged a lot about the Ninth Circuit’s en banc case in United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 5:31 am by SAMANTHA KNIGHTS, MATRIX
The principle of a MIR per se is not objectionable as the Court states (see Konstantinov v Netherlands cited at para. 84) but the impact of the new threshold is surely a relevant consideration in considering compatibility. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 8:12 am by Kevin Kaufman
This rate reduction is the result of a 2019 tax reform law that also reduced the top marginal corporate income tax rate, among other provisions.[4] In addition, beginning in tax year 2020, the state now offers a bracket adjustment providing a scaled deduction for taxpayers with income of more than $79,300 but less than or equal to $84,600. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 2:33 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Concerned the employment, by the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families, of teachers to work in the European Schools. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 6:40 am by kylew
On Monday, June 27, 2011, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to review the en banc Federal Circuit decision in Hyatt v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 5:00 am by Nathaniel Grow
As stated by WAC Commission Karl Benson:"We’ve declared pretty consistently that the football schedule for 2011 would be drastically challenging for the six remaining members if they lost two footballs games in the 2011 season less than a year away," Benson said Tuesday. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]