Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 3,608
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2014, 12:00 am
This week, the Supreme Court hears the appeal in Hotak v London Borough of Southwark, which is joined with the appeals in Johnson v Solihull and Kanu v Southwark. [read post]
7 May 2013, 4:00 am
The House of Lords put this nicely in Hilton v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 1:00 am
R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor, heard 27-28 Mar 2017. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 12:48 am
The authority cited in support of this proposition is Pozzoli SPA v BDMO [2007] EWCA Civ 588, in which Jacob LJ stated at para 10: "I would add this about permission to appeal in patent cases generally. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 2:02 pm
Lord Neuberger, delivering the judgment of the Court, stated that whether a party was 'making' something was a "a matter of fact and degree". [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 3:08 am
In giving the leading judgment Lord Hodge stated that a fresh procurement is not required where the modifications to the contract are not “substantial”. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 1:35 am
On Wednesday 16 October 2013 the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in R (Chester) v Secretary of State for Justice; and McGeoch v Lord President of the Council & Anor. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 9:22 pm
s licence to kill and torture The Guardian: Lord Justice Moses and the 161 criteria The Guardian: Why is Abu Qatada not on trial? [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 6:10 am
Special Preview: Lord Millett on Prerogative Power and Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty As mentioned above, Volume 7 of the Yearbook includes a short article written by Lord Millett concerning the upcoming Article 50/Brexit appeal (Miller v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union). [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
The committee has included an understanding in the resolution of advice and consent that addresses this point (see section V below). [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:10 pm
Indeed, Lord Sumption stated in his judgment that patent law should depend on “more substantial and predictable considerations than these”. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 9:33 am
If, however, there is some doubt about whether the actual form of compound claimed would result from the described process, it needs to be determined whether following the process would inevitably arrive at the claimed compound.This was the situation in Leo Pharma v Sandoz EWCA Civ 1188, which was decided by Lords Justice Jacob and Patten yesterday (17 November), on appeal from Floyd J's decision in the High Court earlier this year ([2009] EWHC 996 (Pat)). [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 1:45 am
Lord Briggs gave the main judgment, with which Lord Hodge, Lord Sales and Lord Carloway agree. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:57 am
Global Aerospace v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 1:00 am
R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor, heard 27-28 Mar 2017. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 12:52 am
And so, this week Arnold LJ handed down his judgment in FibroGen v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:00 pm
At paragraph 49 of his judgment, the learned judge cited Lord Bingham’s much repeated observations as to the purposes of an “Article 2 investigation” in the leading case of R (Amin) v Secretary of State for the Home Department.[7] These purposes include bringing the facts to light, exposing discreditable conduct or dangerous practices, and providing some degree of comfort to the deceased’s relative by ensuring that lessons are learnt from… [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 8:06 am
R (o.t.a A and B) v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 10:22 am
As Jerry Brown might observe, the Lord works in mysterious ways. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 1:00 am
The increased breadth of the right was noted by Lord Judge CJ in A v Independent News and Media Ltd. [2010] EWCA Civ 343. [read post]
