Search for: "State v. Mains"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 11,684
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2017, 5:31 am
They lost on their main challenge to the compatibility of the rules with the HRA and judicial review principles, the court holding that in general it is the decision in an individual case which may be incompatible with ECHR rights, rather than the relevant general rules or policies (para. 57). [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 10:13 am
In a closely watched case argued in December, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that the state of Maine cannot restrict education reimbursement funds for parents to only “non-sectarian” schools. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
In Mejia v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
In Mejia v. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 10:23 am
West Virginia v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 10:57 pm
Randolph and Brigham City v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 7:31 pm
Co. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 1:44 pm
(NA)Today the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Devillier v. [read post]
21 Nov 2015, 9:36 am
Wood, Nov. 3, 2015, Maine Supreme Judicial Court More Blog Entries: State Farm v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 7:22 am
Rosenberger v. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 4:36 pm
You can read the main decision on BAILII here : X v X (application for a financial remedies order) [2016] EWHC 1995 (Fam) (26 July 2016). [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:56 am
American Electric Power that they can be sued to curb their emissions of carbon dioxide, the main cause of global warming. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 4:37 pm
Beth Stephens reminded the group that in the early days of the ATS plaintiffs almost always included pendant state laws claims in their complaints, and with recent setbacks they have returned to that practice, witness Doe v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 11:58 am
In the 2020 US Supreme Court case Bostock v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 2:22 pm
The first was that sanctuaries beat the administration at the Supreme Court in June of that year; technically, the justices declined to hear United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 8:18 pm
Maine, 527 U.S. 706, 712–13, 754 (1999). [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Last week, the United States Supreme Court decided Fernandez v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 1:36 pm
Date: May 22, 2018 State v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 12:41 pm
As stated by the Appeals Court, NN's main argument against the prior decision is that "unless a statute requires exhaustion, judicial review of agency action under the APA, applicable where no other statutory channel of review is provided, does not require exhaustion unless there is both internal agency review available and the final agency action is rendered inoperative during such review. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 10:14 am
Specifically, the chamber president is referring to the case of Castellanos v. [read post]
