Search for: "State v. Morales " Results 1141 - 1160 of 7,389
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
A key element of the tariff question is the meaning of Section 68.2(1) of the Copyright Act which states: 68.2 (1) Without prejudice to any other remedies available to it, a collective society may, for the period specified in its approved tariff, collect the royalties specified in the tariff and, in default of their payment, recover them in a court of competent jurisdiction. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 4:22 am by SHG
As the Supreme Court of Canada very recently noted, since R. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2021, 11:07 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
A recent Divisional Court decision in Morningstar v. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 6:25 pm by Russell Knight
“The complaint or petition for dissolution of marriage or legal separation shall be verified” 750 ILCS 5/403 “[A]ny complaint, petition, answer, reply, bill of particulars, answer to interrogatories, affidavit, return or proof of service, or other document or pleading filed in any court of this State is required or permitted to be verified, or made, sworn to or verified under oath” 735 ILCS 5/1-109(a) Perhaps the most famous Supreme Court Justice, Justice… [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 7:02 pm
  Sixty-five-year sentence for a juvenile convicted under RICO predicated on murder upheld/ Upon resentencing, the “sentence-package doctrine” must be clearly raised or risk being waived  United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 8:06 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Manitoba Court of Appeal recently released a decision in R v Letkeman, which reviewed the non-custodial sentence imposed on an RCMP officer. [read post]
Stepparent adoption is one of the best ways for the spouse to gain more comprehensive parental rights according to the state of New York when it comes to stepchildren. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 6:34 pm by Jackie O'Brien (AU)
      [1] Thaler v Commissioner of Patents [2021] FCA 879 (Thaler). [2] Both the European Patents Office and the UK High Court have recently rejected patent applications naming DABUS as the inventor. [read post]